-1679476342.png){kind=logo}
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to offer some insight from an evaluation that explored the viability, usefulness and potential of the online platform SocialLearn in providing an online community for Open University Associate Lecturers (part-time teaching staff). Findings from two focus groups and a staff survey highlighted both the potential of an online community and the barriers to successful implementation. In applying a qualitative analysis of the ‘Communities of Inquiry’ (CoI) framework, the pilot project highlighted the importance of social presence and cognitive presence, with minimal elements of a teaching presence within the online staff community. Key learning outcomes around privacy, usability and multi-level communications were found to be central in creating a successful online academic environment for teaching staff.
Keywords
References
- 1. (2008). ‘The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence’. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 12, 3/4, 3-22 Google Scholar
- 2. (2010). ‘Skepticism to success: meeting critical workforce needs through innovation and collaboration’. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 14, 3, 60-67 Google Scholar
- 3. (2011). ‘Social Presence within the community of inquiry framework’. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 12, 5, 40-56 Google Scholar
- 4. , Akyol, Z. Garrison, D.R. (2013). ‘Teaching in an online community of inquiry: faculty role adjustment in the new higher education’. Educational Communities of Inquiry: Theoretical Framework, Research and Practice. Hershey, PA:IGI Global , 389-400 Google Scholar
- 5. , Martorella, P.H. (1997). ‘Online learning communities. implications for the social sciences’. Interactive Technologies and the Social Studies: Emerging Issues and Applications. Albany:State University of New York Press Google Scholar
- 6. (2011). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. 2nd ed., London:Routledge/Taylor and Francis Google Scholar
- 7. (2012). ‘Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 13, 1, 250-253 Google Scholar
- 8. , Akyol, Z. Garrison, D.R. (2013). ‘Theoretical foundations and epistemological insights of the community of inquiry’. Educational Communities of Inquiry: Theoretical Framework, Research and Practice. Hershey, PA:IGI Global , 1-11 Google Scholar
- 9. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. London:Routledge/Falmer Google Scholar
- 10. (2007). ‘Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions’. Internet and Higher Education. 10, 3, 157-172 Google Scholar
- 11. (2000). ‘Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education’. The Internet and Higher Education. 2, 2/3, 87-105 Google Scholar
- 12. (2010). ‘Exploring causal relations among teaching, cognitive and social presence: a holistic view of the community of inquiry framework’. Internet and Higher Education. 13, 1/2, 31-36 Google Scholar
- 13. (2013).
The Communities of Inquiry.
(accessed 11 November 2013) , [online] https://coi.athabascau.ca/ Google Scholar - 14. (2004). ‘Online learning: social interaction and the creation of a sense of community’. Educational Technology & Society. 7, 3, 73-81 Google Scholar
- 15. (2007). Building Online Learning Communities: Effective Strategies for the Virtual Classroom. 2nd ed., San Francisco:John Wiley and Sons Google Scholar
- 16. (2013). ‘Social networks as spaces for informal teacher professional development: challenges and opportunities’. Int. J. Web Based Communities. 9, 2, 199-211 Google Scholar
- 17. (2007). ‘The temporal integration of connected study into a structured life’. Grounded Theory Review. 6, 2, 95-115 Google Scholar
- 18. (2011). ‘Establishing and maintaining an online community of academics: longitudinal evaluation of a virtual conference series’. Int. J. Web Based Communities. 7, 1, 116-135 Abstract, Google Scholar
- 19. (2010). ‘The road not taken: the divergence of corporate and academic web instruction’. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 14, 2, 3-8 Google Scholar
- 20. (2006). ‘How blended learning can support a faculty development community of inquiry’. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 10, 4, 139-152 Google Scholar
- 21. (1999). ‘Factors influencing interaction in an online course’. American Journal of Distance Education. 13, 3, 22-36 Google Scholar
- 22. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
- 23. (2012). ‘Interaction in an asynchronous online course: a synthesis of quantitative indicators’. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 16, 4, 71-82 Google Scholar
