Skip to main content
Skip main navigation
No Access

Supporting the ideation processes by a collaborative online based toolset

Published Online:pp 218-225https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2011.041948

Successful innovations depend upon what input is given to the development process. That input is developed in the early stage of innovation in which neither problems nor goals are well-defined (Simon, 1973; Bayazit, 2004). The presented research focuses on how innovators’ requirements towards software tools supporting early-stage innovation can be met by suitable working environments. Allan (2007) describes early-stage innovation as a social process where individuals and groups work together in a collaborative way. This paper examines how such collaborative work can be encouraged by applying game dynamics to early-stage innovation processes. The game dynamics examined are implemented in an integrated software solution designed to support innovators with getting connected to the right people, producing ideas based on exploring knowledge and evaluating them to achieve the goal of developing successful innovations. The presented approach is based on the research carried out by the European Community funded Integrated Project Laboranova.

Keywords

collaborative working environments, collaboration, innovation, ideation, early-stage innovation, innovations fuzzy front end, routines

References

  • 1. Allan, T. (2007). Keeping Pace. accessed 31 01 2007, available at http://esd.mit.edu/HeadLine/allen030106/allen030106.htm Google Scholar
  • 2. Bauer, B. (2006). ‘Design & Methoden’. in Design Report 11/06. Leinfelden-Echterdingen:Blue C. Verlag GmbH Google Scholar
  • 3. Bayazit, N. (2004). ‘Investigating design: a review of 40 years of design research’. essay in Design Issues. 20, 1, Google Scholar
  • 4. Cross, N. , Cross, Nigel (1984). Developments in Design Methodology. Chichester:The Open University, published by John Wiley & Sons Google Scholar
  • 5. Cross, N. (2001). ‘Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science’. paper prepared for the Design+Research Symposium, 05 2000, held at the Politecnico di Milano, Italy, MIT Online Google Scholar
  • 6. Design Notes (2006). accessed 15 02 2007, available at http://www.dwr.com/images/newsletter/20061010_salads/index.html Google Scholar
  • 7. Hribernik, K. , Thoben, K-D. , Nilsson, M. (2007a). ‘Technological challenges to the research and development of collaborative working environments’. in Encyclopedia of E-Collaboration. Idea Group Reference Google Scholar
  • 8. Hribernik, K. , Thoben, K-D. , Nilsson, M. (2007b). ‘Collaborative working environments’. in Encyclopedia of E-Collaboration. Idea Group Reference Google Scholar
  • 9. Klünder, P. (2006). ‘Planbarer Brückenschlag’. in Design Report 11/06. Leinfelden-Echterdingen:Blue C. Verlag GmbH Google Scholar
  • 10. NovaNet Konsortium (2006). Nutzung von Internet und Intranet für die Entwicklung neuer Produkte und Dienstleistungen. Stuttgart:Fraunhofer IEB Verlag Google Scholar
  • 11. Rhea, D. (2005). ‘Bringing clarity to the ‘fuzzy front end’, a predictable process for innovation’. Design Research. Cambridge:The MIT Press Google Scholar
  • 12. Rothwell, R. (1992). ‘Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s’. in R&D Management. 22, Google Scholar
  • 13. Schumpeter, J.A. (1952). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Berlin:Dunker&Humblot Google Scholar
  • 14. Simon, H. (1973). ‘The structure of ill-structured problems’. originally published in Artificial Tony J. Watson. Rhetoric, Discourse and Argument in Organizational Sense Making: a Reflexive Tale. Organizational Studies. 16, 5, 805-821 Google Scholar
  • 15. Vaghefi, M.R. , Huellmantel, A.B. (1998). Strategic Management for the XX Century. Boca Ranton Google Scholar
  • 16. Weisberg, W. (1993). ‘Creativity’. Beyond the Myth of Genius. New York:Freeman Google Scholar