Skip to main content
Search
Search
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Skip main navigation
No Access

The entrepreneurial growth of firms located in clusters: a cross-case study

Published Online:March 7, 2011pp 53-79https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2011.038829

Abstract

The notion of regional clusters of firms has been the subject of research for over a century. Recent research has increasingly reported evidence of cluster firms’ growth, contrasting with the general assumption that being embedded in a cluster restrains the possibility for firm growth in terms of attitude, opportunities and resources. However, despite the recent research interest on those firms that have experienced growth, detaching from the cluster cliché of being small, local and homogeneous, little is known on the antecedents of such growth. In this paper, we use the lenses of firm-level entrepreneurship as a framework for analysing, comparing and generalising the empirical results of four case studies (Alessi, Illycaffè, Luxottica and Geox). We argue that local and non-local resources and competencies, together with firm capabilities of acquisition and recombination, are the main antecedents of the continuous process of opportunity recognition and exploitation, i.e., growth of cluster firms.

Keywords

entrepreneurial growth, innovation, clusters, cross-case study, knowledge

References

  • 1. Alberti, F.G. (2006). ‘The decline of the industrial district of Como: recession, relocation or reconversion?’. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 18, 6, 473-501 Google Scholar
  • 2. Albino, V. , Garavelli, A.C. , Schiuma, G. (1999). ‘Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationship: the role of the leader firm’. Technovation. 19, 1, 53-63 Google Scholar
  • 3. Allen, T.J. (1977). Managing the Flow of Technology. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press Google Scholar
  • 4. Alvarez, S.A. , Barney, J.B. , Hitt, A.M. Ireland, D.R. Camp, M.S. Sexton, D.L. (2002). ‘Resource-based theory and the entrepreneurial firm’. Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset. Oxford:Blackwell , 89-105 Google Scholar
  • 5. Amabile, T.M. , Staw, B.M. Cummings, L.L. (1988). ‘A model of creativity and innovations in organizations’. Research in Organizational Behaviour. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press , 123-167 Google Scholar
  • 6. Appleyard, M.M. (1996). ‘How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry’. Strategic Management Journal. 17, 137-154 Google Scholar
  • 7. Asheim, B.T. (1996). ‘Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: a condition of prosperity’. European Planning Studies. 4, 4, 379-400 Google Scholar
  • 8. Bailey, K.D. (1982). Methods of Social Research. New York:Free Press Google Scholar
  • 9. Baron, R. (2000). ‘Counterfactual thinking and venture formation: the potential effects of thinking about ‘what might have been’’. Journal of Business Venturing. 15, 1, 79-91 Google Scholar
  • 10. Barringer, B.R. , Bluedorn, A.C. (1999). ‘The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management’. Strategic Management Journal. 20, 421-444 Google Scholar
  • 11. Barron, F.A. , Harrington, D.M. (1981). ‘Creativity, intelligence and personality’. Annual Review of Psychology. 32, 439-467 Google Scholar
  • 12. Basadur, M.S. , Graen, G.B. , Wakabayashi, M. (1990). ‘Identifying differences in creative problem solving style’. Journal of Creative Behavior. 24, 2, 111-131 Google Scholar
  • 13. Becattini, G. (2002). ‘Industrial sectors and industrial districts: tools for industrial analysis’. European Planning Studies. 10, 4, 483-493 Google Scholar
  • 14. Boari, C. , Lipparini, A. (1999). ‘Networks within industrial districts: organizing knowledge creation and transfer by means of moderate hierarchies’. Journal of Management and Governance. 3, 4, 339-360 Google Scholar
  • 15. Boschma, R.A , ter Wal, A.L.J. (2007). ‘Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: the case of a footwear district in the south of Italy’. Industry and Innovation. 14, 2, 177-199 Google Scholar
  • 16. Boschma, R.A. , Lambooy, J.G. (2002). ‘Knowledge, market structure and economic coordination: dynamics of industrial districts’. Growth and Change. 33, 3, 291-311 Google Scholar
  • 17. Cainelli, G. , Iacobucci, D. , Moranti, E. (2006). ‘Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts’. Regional Studies. 40, 5, 507-518 Google Scholar
  • 18. Camagni, R. , Camagni, R. (1991). ‘Introduction: from the local ‘milieu’ to innovation through cooperation networks’. Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. London:Belhaven Press , 1-9 Google Scholar
  • 19. Camuffo, A. (2003). ‘Transforming industrial districts: large firms and small business networks in the Italian eyewear industry’. Industry and Innovation. 10, 4, 377-401 Google Scholar
  • 20. Cohen, M.D. , Levinthal, D.A. (1990). ‘Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation’. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35, 128-152 Google Scholar
  • 21. Cooke, P. , Barnes, T. Gertler, M. (1999). ‘The cooperative advantage of regions’. The New Industrial Geography: Regions, Regulation and Institutions. London:Routledge , 54-73 Google Scholar
  • 22. Cooke, P. (2001). ‘Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy’. Industrial and Corporate Change. 10, 4, 945-974 Google Scholar
  • 23. Cuervo, A. (2005). ‘Individual and environmental determinants of entrepreneurship’. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 1, 293-311 Google Scholar
  • 24. Daft, R.L. , Lengel, R.H. (1986). ‘Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design’. Management Science. 32, 554-571 Google Scholar
  • 25. Davidsson, P. (1991). ‘Continued entrepreneurship: ability, need and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth’. Journal of Business Venturing. 6, 405-429 Google Scholar
  • 26. Davidsson, P. , Delmar, F. , Wiklund, J. , Hitt, M. Ireland, D. (2002). ‘Entrepreneurship as growth; growth as entrepreneurship’. Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset. Oxford:Blackwell Publishers , 328-342 Google Scholar
  • 27. Delmar, F. , Donckels, R. , Miettinien, A. (1997). ‘Measuring growth: methodological considerations and empirical results’. Entrepreneurship and SME Research: On its Way to the Next Millennium. Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, VA:Ashgate , 190-216 Google Scholar
  • 28. Dickson, P.H. , Weaver, K.M. (2008). ‘The role of the institutional environment in determining firm orientation towards entrepreneurial behavior’. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 4, 467-483 Google Scholar
  • 29. Drucker, P.F. (1985). ‘The discipline of innovation’. Harvard Business Review. 63, 3, 67-72 Google Scholar
  • 30. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). ‘Building theories from case study research’. Academy of Management Review. 14, 532-550 Google Scholar
  • 31. Elche, D.M. , Gonzalez, A. (2008). ‘Influence of innovation on performance: analysis of Spanish service firms’. Service Industries Journal. 28, 1483-1499 Google Scholar
  • 32. Gartner, W.B. (1990). ‘What are we talking about when we are talking about entrepreneurship?’. Journal of Business Venturing. 5, 15-28 Google Scholar
  • 33. Harrison, B. (1994). ‘The Italian industrial districts and the crisis of the cooperative form: part II’. European Planning Studies. 2, 159-174 Google Scholar
  • 34. Holstein, J.A. , Gubrium, J.F. , Silvermann, D. (1997). ‘Active interviewing’. Qualitative Research. London:Sage , 113-129 Google Scholar
  • 35. Jansen, J.J.P. , van den Bosch, F.A.J. , Volberda, H.W. (2005). ‘Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?’. Academy of Management Journal. 48, 999-1015 Google Scholar
  • 36. Jaworski, B.J. , Kohli, A.K. (1993). ‘Market orientation: antecedents and consequences’. Journal of Marketing. 57, 53-70 Google Scholar
  • 37. Jennings, D.F. , Lumpkin, G.T. (1989). ‘Insights between environmental scanning activities and Porter’s generic strategies: an empirical analysis’. Journal of Management. 18, 4, 791-804 Google Scholar
  • 38. Kanter, R.M. (1985). ‘Supporting innovation and venture development in established companies’. Journal of Business Venturing. 1, 47-60 Google Scholar
  • 39. Kazanjian, R.K. , Drazin, R. , Glynn, M.A. , Hitt, A.M. Ireland, D.R. Camp, M.S. Sexton, D.L. (2002). ‘Implementing strategies for corporate entrepreneurship: a knowledge-based perspective’. Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset. Oxford:Blackwell , 173-200 Google Scholar
  • 40. Kogut, B. , Zander, U. (1992). ‘Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology’. Organization Science. 3, 383-397 Google Scholar
  • 41. Krugman, P.R. (1991a). Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press Google Scholar
  • 42. Krugman, P.R. (1991b). ‘Increasing returns and economic geography’. The Journal of Political Economy. 99, 3, 483-499 Google Scholar
  • 43. Lazerson, M. , Lorenzoni, G. (1999). ‘The firms that feed industrial districts: a return to the Italian source’. Industrial and Corporate Change. 8, 2, 235-266 Google Scholar
  • 44. Lenox, M. , King, A. (2004). ‘Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision’. Strategic Management Journal. 25, 331-345 Google Scholar
  • 45. Lim, S.B. , Ribeiro, D. , Lee, S.M. (2008). ‘Factors affecting the performance of entrepreneurial service firms’. Service Industries Journal. 28, 1003-1013 Google Scholar
  • 46. Lipparini, A. (1995). Imprese, Relazioni tra Imprese e Posizionamento Competitivo. Milano:Etas Libri Google Scholar
  • 47. Livesay, H.C. (1995). Entrepreneurship and the Growth of the Firms. Camberley, UK and Brookfield, US:Edward Elgar Google Scholar
  • 48. Malerba, F. , Orsenigo, L. (1996). ‘The dynamics and evolution of industries’. Industrial and Corporate Change. 5, 1, 51-87 Google Scholar
  • 49. Malipiero, A. , Munari, F. , Sobrero, M. (2005). ‘Focal firms as technological gatekeepers within industrial districts: knowledge creation and dissemination in the Italian packaging machinery industry’. Copenhagen Business School, DRUID working paper No. 5 Google Scholar
  • 50. Mansfield, E. (1985). ‘How rapidly does industrial technology leak out?’. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 34, 217-224 Google Scholar
  • 51. Markusen, A. (1996). ‘Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts’. Economic Geography. 72, 293-313 Google Scholar
  • 52. Marshall, A. (1950). Principles of Economics. London:Macmillan Google Scholar
  • 53. Miles, M.B. , Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Google Scholar
  • 54. Morris, M.H. , Kuratko, D.F. (2002). Corporate Entrepreneurship. Fort Worth, TX:Harcourt College Publishers Google Scholar
  • 55. Morrison, A. (2004). ‘Gatekeepers of knowledge’ within industrial districts: who they are, how they interact’. Bocconi University, CESPRI working Paper No. 63 Google Scholar
  • 56. Mumford, M.D. (2000). ‘Managing creative people: strategies and tactics for innovation’. Human Resources Management. 10, 313-351 Google Scholar
  • 57. Nahapiet, J. , Ghoshal, S. (1998). ‘Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage’. Academy of Management Review. 23, 242-266 Google Scholar
  • 58. Nelson, R.R. , Winter, S.G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press Google Scholar
  • 59. Normann, R. (1977). Managing for Growth. New York:Wiley Google Scholar
  • 60. Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. London:Basil Blackwell Google Scholar
  • 61. Pettigrew, A. (1990). ‘Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice’. Organization Science. 1, 3, 267-291 Google Scholar
  • 62. Piore, M.J. , Sabel, C. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide. New York:Basic Books Google Scholar
  • 63. Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York:The Free Press Google Scholar
  • 64. Porter, M.E. (2000). ‘Location, competition and economic development: local clusters in a global economy’. Economic Development Quarterly. 14, 1, 15-34 Google Scholar
  • 65. Prahalad, C.K. , Hamel, G. (1990). ‘The core competence of the corporation’. Harvard Business Review. 68, 3, 79-91 Google Scholar
  • 66. Pyke, F. Becattini, G. Sengenberger, W. (1990). Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Cooperation in Italy. Geneva:International Institute for Labor Studies Google Scholar
  • 67. Rabellotti, R. , Schmitz, H. (1999). ‘The internal heterogeneity of industrial districts in Italy, Brazil and Mexico’. Regional Studies. 33, 2, 97-108 Google Scholar
  • 68. Romero-Martinez, A.M. , Montoro-Sanchez, A. (2008). ‘How clusters can encourage entrepreneurship and venture creation. Reason and advantages’. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 4, 315-329 Google Scholar
  • 69. Salvato, C. , Lassini, U. , Wiklund, J. , Katz, J. Shepherd, D. Wiklund, J. Dimov, D. (2006). ‘Dynamics of external growth in SMEs: a process model of acquisition capabilities emergence’. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth. 9, Oxford:Elsevier Science , 237-275 Google Scholar
  • 70. Sarasvathy, D. , Simon, H. , Lave, L. (1998). ‘Perceiving and managing business risks: differences between entrepreneurs and bankers’. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 33, 207-225 Google Scholar
  • 71. Seale, C. (2004). Quality in Qualitative Research. London:Sage Publications Google Scholar
  • 72. Shane, S. (2000). ‘Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities’. Organization Science. 11, 448-469 Google Scholar
  • 73. Shane, S. (2003). A General Theory of entrepreneurship. The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA:Edward Elgar Google Scholar
  • 74. Shane, S. , Venkataraman, S. (2000). ‘The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research’. Academy of Management Review. 25, 1, 217-226 Google Scholar
  • 75. Stevenson, H.H. , Jarillo, J.C. (1990). ‘A paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management’. Strategic Management Journal. 11, 17-27 Google Scholar
  • 76. Stevenson, H.H. , Roberts, M. , Grousbeck, H. (1989). New Business Ventures and the Entrepreneur. Homewood, IL:Irwin Google Scholar
  • 77. Tallman, S. , Jenkins, M. , Henry, N. , Pinch, S. (2004). ‘Knowledge, clusters and competitive advantage’. Academy of Management Review. 29, 2, 258-271 Google Scholar
  • 78. Tushman, M.L. (1977). ‘Special boundary roles in the innovation process’. Administrative Science Quarterly. 22, 587-605 Google Scholar
  • 79. Veciana, J.M. , Urbano, D. (2008). ‘The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research’. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 5, 365-379 Google Scholar
  • 80. Venkataraman, S. , Katz, J. Brockhaus, J. (1997). ‘The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor’s perspective’. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press , 791-805 Google Scholar
  • 81. Von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation. New York:Oxford University Press Google Scholar
  • 82. Wall, S.T. (2005). ‘The protean organization: learning to love change’. Organizational Dynamics. 34, 1, 37-46 Google Scholar
  • 83. Whitford, J. (2001). ‘The decline of a model? Challenges and response in the Italian industrial districts’. Economy and Society. 30, 1, 38-65 Google Scholar
  • 84. Wiklund, J. (1998). ‘Small firm growth and performance: entrepreneurship and beyond’. Jonkoping, Sweden:Jonkoping International Business School , JIBS dissertation series No. 3 Google Scholar
  • 85. Yin, R.K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London:Sage Google Scholar
  • 86. Zahra, S.A. (1991). ‘Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: an exploratory study’. Journal of Business Venturing. 6, 259-285 Google Scholar
Previous article
Next article