Skip to main content
Search
Search
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Skip main navigation
No Access

Governance of energy system transition: theoretical framework and empirical analysis in Europe

Published Online:September 30, 2013pp 50-69https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIS.2013.056607

Abstract

Transformation towards sustainable energy system requires substantial changes in current energy production and consumption patterns. This paper addresses system transition as a valuable approach in contributing to these changes. The main purpose of the paper is to develop and apply a framework for analysing and supporting energy system research and governance. This paper is based on literature review, expert consultations and empirically based-theory building. The developed framework is applied in the analysis of a selected case study of the European hydrogen energy system governance. The main result of the paper is that different governance and funding models with their practices and experiences can play an important role in the transition, but even more important may be the combined use of different modes that contribute to the development of the energy system transition. Moreover, the use of such an overarching transition framework supports the coordination efforts between many sometimes even controversial efforts in the development of energy systems.

Keywords

energy systems, energy policy, governance, lock-in, research and innovation policy, transitions

References

  • 1. Arrowsmith, J. , Sisson, K. , Marginson, P. (2004). ‘What can ‘benchmarking’ offer the open method of co-ordination?’. Journal of European Public Policy. 11, 2, 311-328 Google Scholar
  • 2. Barré, R. (2007). Groupe de Travail Futuris. Suivi du SFRI et de ses Instruments Google Scholar
  • 3. Carraro, C. , Leveque, F. (1999). Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy. 14, Dordrecht, Boston and London:Kluwer Academic , Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Series on Economics, Energy and Environment Google Scholar
  • 4. Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. (2006). ‘A policy approach to the environmental impacts of technological lock-in’. Ecological Economics. 58, 4, 717-742 Google Scholar
  • 5. Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. , Unruh, G. (2006). ‘Technology stability and change: an integrated evolutionary approach’. Journal of Economic Issues. XL, 3, 707-742 Google Scholar
  • 6. Del Río, P. , Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. , Könnölä, T. (2010). ‘Policy strategies to promote eco-innovation: An integrated framework’. Journal of IndustrialEcology. 14, 4, 541-557 Google Scholar
  • 7. Delmas, M. , Terlaak, A. (2001). ‘A framework for analysing environmental voluntary agreements’. California Management Review. 43, 3, 44-63 Google Scholar
  • 8. COM (2006). Towards a European Strategic Energy Technology Plan. Communication from the Commission to the Council,the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussel, 847 final Google Scholar
  • 9. COM (2007a). A European Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan). Full Impact Assessment, Commission Staff Working Document, accompanying document to the Communication from The Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions, Brussels,723 final Google Scholar
  • 10. COM (2007b). A Lead Market Initiative for Europe. Commision of the European Communities, Brussels, 860 final Google Scholar
  • 11. COM (2009). Investing in the Development of Low Carbon Technologies (SET-Plan). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, 519 final Google Scholar
  • 12. Edler, J. , Georghiou, L. (2007). ‘Public procurement and innovation – resurrecting the demand side’. Research Policy. 36, 949-963 Google Scholar
  • 13. Eerola, A. , Loikkanen, T. (2010). Governance and Research of Nordic Energy System Transition. Summary Report of the GoReNEST Project Assessing the Potential Use of Transition Management in Planning the Nordic Energy Transition and Related Policy, VTT Research Notes 2505 Google Scholar
  • 14. Ergas, H. , Dasgupta, P. Stoneman, P. (1987). ‘The importance of technology policy’. Economic Policy and Technological Performance. Cambridge University Press, 51-96 Google Scholar
  • 15. Kaiser, R. , Prange, H. (2004). ‘Managing diversity in a system of multi-level governance: the open method of co-ordination in innovation policy’. Journal of European Public Policy. 11, 2, 249-266 Google Scholar
  • 16. Könnölä, T. , Unruh, G.C. (2006). ‘Really changing the course: the limitations of environmental management systems for innovation’. The Journal of Business Strategy and the Environment. 16, 8, 525-537 Google Scholar
  • 17. Könnölä, T. , Unruh, G. , Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. (2007). ‘Toward prospective voluntary agreements: reflections from a hydrogen foresight project’. Journal of Cleaner Production. 15, 3, 259-265 Google Scholar
  • 18. Könnölä, T. , Salo, A. , Brummer, V. (2011). ‘Foresight for European coordination: developing national priorities for the forest based sector technology platform’. International Journal of Technology Management. 54, 4, 438-459 Abstract, Google Scholar
  • 19. Lund, P.D. , Sønderberg Petersen, L. Larsen, H. (2007). ‘Integrated European energy RTD as part of the innovation chain to enhance renewable energy market breakthrough’. Energy Solutions for Sustainable Development, Proceedings of Risø International Energy Conference. Risø-R-1608(EN) Google Scholar
  • 20. Lundvall, B.A. (1992). National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London:Pinter Google Scholar
  • 21. Menanteau, P. (2002). ‘Can negotiated agreements replace efficiency standards as an instrument for transforming the electrical appliance market?’. Cahier de Recherche N° 28 BIS, Institut d’Economie et de Politique de l’Energie Google Scholar
  • 22. Rotmans, J. , Kemp, R. , et al. (2001). ‘More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy’. Foresight. 3, 1, 15-32 Google Scholar
  • 23. Schäfer, A. (2006). ‘A new form of governance? Comparing the open method of co-ordination to multilateral surveillance by the IMF and the OECD’. Journal of European Public Policy. 13, 1, 70-88 Google Scholar
  • 24. Schoen, A. , Könnölä, T. , Warnke, P. , Barré, R. , Kuhlmann, S. (2008). ‘Tailoring foresight to field specificities’. paper presented at the Third International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: Impacts and Implications for Policy and Decision-Making, 16–17 October, Seville, Spain Google Scholar
  • 25. Thompson, M. , Ellis, R. , Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural Theory. USA:Westview Press, Boulder, CO Google Scholar
  • 26. Tukker, A. , Butter, M. (2007). ‘Governance of sustainable transitions: about the 4(0), ways to change the world’. Journal of Cleaner Production. 15, 1, 94-103 Google Scholar
  • 27. Unruh, G.C. (2002). ‘Escaping carbon lock-in’. Energy Policy. 30, 4, 317-325 Google Scholar
  • 28. Unruh, G. , Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. (2006). ‘Globalizing carbon lock-in’. Energy Policy. 34, 10, 1185-1197 Google Scholar
  • 29. Weber, M. , Hoogma, R. , Lane, B. , Schot, J. (1999). ‘Experimentingwithsustainable transport innovations: a workbook for strategic niche management’. IPTS Report. ISBN 9036512751 Google Scholar

Additional References

Previous article
Next article