Skip to main content
No Access

Entrepreneurial firms and cluster competitiveness: institutions and public policy determinants

Published Online:pp 25-49

Globalisation brings many competitive challenges to emerging economies, particularly to small and medium-size firms (SMEs). Focusing on the information technology cluster in Brazil, Latin America’s largest economy, and a high-tech municipality (Campinas) the researchers examined the role of governmental institutions and their interaction with business and academe to foster competitiveness. Despite a high quality infrastructure and an excellent workforce, most public sector initiatives are not specific to SMEs nor to the needs of companies located in Campinas. Factors like: 1) the lack of a governance structure to coordinate policies in support of SMEs; 2) the absence of sufficient public resources to support innovation and bring new products to market; 3) the inaccessibility of research centres for small firms hinders the growth and development of Campinas as a dynamic IT cluster. The researchers propose 15 specific actions to improve the competitiveness of SME technology firms in Campinas and in the cluster.

Keywords

Brazil, clusters, public policy, entrepreneurial firms, information technology sector, small and medium-size enterprises, SMEs

References

  • 1. Araújo, E.E.R.de. , Meira, S.R.de.L. (2005). Inserção competitiva do Brasil no mercado internacional de software. (accessed 11 June 2011), S.l, [online] http://www.softex.br/portal/softexweb/uploadDocuments/Insercao-competitiva-do-Brasil-no-mercado-internacional-de-software(1).pdf Google Scholar
  • 2. Aydalot, P. , Keeble, D. (1998). High Technology Industry and Innovative Environments. London:Routledge Google Scholar
  • 3. Baptista, R. , Swann, G.M.P. Prevezer, M. Stout, D. (1998). ‘Clusters, innovation and growth: a survey of the literature’. The Dynamics of Industrial Clusters: International Comparisons in Computing and Biotechnology. Oxford:Oxford University Press , 13-51 Google Scholar
  • 4. Camagni, R.P. (1995). ‘The concept of innovative milieu and its relevance for public policies in European lagging regions’. Papers in Regional Sciences. 74, 4, 317-440 Google Scholar
  • 5. Ceglie, G. , Dini, M. (1999). ‘SME cluster and network development in developing countries: the experience of Unido’. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Private Sector Development Branch Working Paper Google Scholar
  • 6. Ellison, E. , Glaeser, E. ‘The geographic concentration of industry: does natural advantage explain agglomeration?’. American Economic Review,Papers and Proceedings of the One Hundred Eleventh Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association. 1999, 05, 89, 2, 311-316 Google Scholar
  • 7. Felzensztein, C. , Gimmon, E. (2009). ‘Managing marketing externalities in innovative natural resources-based clusters’. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice. 11, 1, 74-84 Google Scholar
  • 8. Felzensztein, C. , Gimmon, E. , Carter, S. (2010). ‘Geographical co-location, social networks and inter-firm marketing cooperation: the case of the salmon industry’. Long Range Planning. 43, 5–6, 675-690 Google Scholar
  • 9. Gordon, I. , McCann, P. , Karlsson, C. Johansson, B. Stough, R. (2005). ‘Clusters, innovation and regional development: an analysis of current theories and evidence’. Industrial Clusters and Inter-Firm Networks. Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar Google Scholar
  • 10. Haar, J. , Meyer-Stamer, J. (2008). Small Firms, Global Markets. London and New York:Palgrave Macmillan Google Scholar
  • 11. Humphrey, J. , Schmitz, H. Principles for Promoting Clusters and Networks for SMEs, Small and Medium Enterprises Branch. 1995, 10, UNIDO Google Scholar
  • 12. Kenny, M. Florida, R. (2004). Locating Global Advantage. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press Google Scholar
  • 13. Meyer-Stamer, J. , Karlsson, C. Johansson, B. Stough, R. (2005). ‘Paradoxes and ironies of locational policy in the new global economy’. Industrial Clusters and Inter-Firm Networks. Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar Google Scholar
  • 14. Ottoni, L. ‘Governo apóia pólos regionais de pequena e média empresa’. Gazeta Mercantil. 2004, 08, 02, São Paulo, 6, Caderno A Google Scholar
  • 15. Piore, M. , Sabel, C. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide. New York:Basic Books Google Scholar
  • 16. Portal Do Governo Do Estado De São Paulo (2006a). Arranjos Produtivos Locais. (accessed 21 February 2006), [online] http://www.saopaulo.sp.gov.br/projetosestrategicos/pe23_arranjos_locais.htm Google Scholar
  • 17. Portal Do Governo Do Estado De São Paulo (2006b). Sistema Paulista de Parques Tecnológicos. (accessed 21 February 2006), [online] http://www.saopaulo.sp.gov.br/projetosestrategicos/pe24_ensino_parques_tecnologicos.htm Google Scholar
  • 18. Porter, M.E. (1998). On Competition. Boston:Harvard Business Review Books Google Scholar
  • 19. Quandt, C. (1997). The Emerging High-technology Cluster of Campinas. (accessed 21 February 2006), Brazil. Réseau international de forêts modeles, [online] http://www.rifm.net/uploads/user-S/10380004720Campinas.doc Google Scholar
  • 20. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press Google Scholar
  • 21. Schmitz, H. (1994). ‘Collective efficiency: growth path for small-scale industry’. Journal of Development Studies. 31, 4, 529-566 Google Scholar
  • 22. Schmitz, H. (2004). Local Economies in the Global Economy. Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar Google Scholar
  • 23. Senhoras, E.M. (2002). ‘Cluster e Desenvolvimento Local em Campinas’. IX SIMPEP, 04 a 06 de novembro de 2002, Bauru Google Scholar
  • 24. Spencer, J. , Gomez, C. (2001). ‘Can governments promote entrepreneurship? Evidence from Costa Rica, Uruguay and Chile’. Center for Latin American Issues, The George Washington University, Working Paper Series Google Scholar
  • 25. World Bank (2010). Doing Business 2010. Washington, DC:World Bank Google Scholar

References