Skip to main content
No Access

What the flip: impact of flipped instruction on self-regulated learning

Published Online:pp 303-325https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2014.067638

Flipped instruction, while becoming a more common pedagogical approach is still a nascent area for empirical research. This comparative case study of the use of flipped instruction in two courses – one face-to-face and the other online – by the same instructor examines how flipped instruction can be used differently in different courses. The study examines how students interact with flipped video content and how their use of it supports self-regulated learning. Findings suggest that flipped instruction both requires and cultivates self-regulated learning. Flipped instruction provides temporal ‘space’ for metacognition and increases student self-efficacy and motivation. While flipped instruction has limitations, it makes online learning more palatable. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research.

Keywords

self-regulated learning, SRL, flipped instruction, reverse instruction, classroom flip, blended learning, inverted classroom, social media, interactive learning environments

References

  • 1. P. Bergamin, E. Werlen, E. Siegenthaler, S. Ziska, '‘The relationship between flexible and self-regulated learning in open and distance universities’' The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (2012) Google Scholar
  • 2. J. Bergmann, A. Sams, Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day (2012) Google Scholar
  • 3. D. Butler, P. Winne, '‘Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis’' Review of Educational Research (1995) Google Scholar
  • 4. P.F. Carspecken, Critical Ethnography in Educational Research (1996) Google Scholar
  • 5. J. Cole, J. Kritzer, '‘Strategies for success: teaching an online course’' Rural Special Education Quarterly (2009) Google Scholar
  • 6. M. DiBenedetto, H. Bembenutty, '‘Within the pipeline: self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and socialization among college students in science courses’' Learning and Individual Differences (2013) Google Scholar
  • 7. M. Eisenhart, K. Ercikan Ed., W.M. Roth Ed., '‘Generalization from qualitative inquiry’' Generalizing from Educational Research: Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Polarization (2009) Google Scholar
  • 8. Etale, (2013) Google Scholar
  • 9. J. Enfield, '‘Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN’' TechTrends (2013) Google Scholar
  • 10. E. Finkel, '‘Flipping the script in K12’' District Administrator (2012) Google Scholar
  • 11. K. Fulton, '‘The flipped classroom: transforming education at Byron High School’' The Journal (2012) Google Scholar
  • 12. B. Goodwin, K. Miller, '‘Evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in’' Educational Leadership (2013) Google Scholar
  • 13. B. Hofer, S. Yu, P. Pintrich, D.H. Schunk Ed., B.J. Zimmerman Ed., '‘Teaching college students to be self-regulated learners’' Self-regulated Learning: From Teaching to Self-Reflective Practice (1998) Google Scholar
  • 14. M. Lage, G. Platt, M. Treglia, '‘Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment’' Journal of Economic Education (2000) Google Scholar
  • 15. D. Lancy, Qualitative Research in Education: An Introduction to the Major Traditions (1993) Google Scholar
  • 16. F. Maher, M. Tetreault, '‘Frames of positionality: constructing meaningful dialogues about gender and race’' Anthological Quarterly (1993) Google Scholar
  • 17. G. Mason, T. Shuman, K. Cook, '‘Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering class’' IEEE Transactions on Education (2013) Google Scholar
  • 18. S. McDaniel, D. Caverly, '‘The community of inquiry model for an inverted developmental math classroom’' Journal of Developmental Education (2010) Google Scholar
  • 19. N. Milman, '‘The flipped classroom strategy: what is it and how can it best be used’' Distance Learning (2012) Google Scholar
  • 20. P. Mishra, M. Koehler, '‘Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a new framework for teacher knowledge’' Teachers College Record (2006) Google Scholar
  • 21. M. Nodoushan, '‘Self-regulated learning (SRL): emergence of the RSRLM model’' International Journal of Language Studies (2012) Google Scholar
  • 22. T.A. Schwandt, Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry (2001) Google Scholar
  • 23. R. Stake, The Art of Case Study Research (1995) Google Scholar
  • 24. J. Strayer, '‘How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation’' Learning Environment Research (2012) Google Scholar
  • 25. G. Toppo, '‘Flipped classrooms offer virtual learning’' USA Today (2011) Google Scholar
  • 26. S. Vassallo, '‘Resistance to self-regulated learning pedagogy in an urban classroom: a critique of neoliberalism’' Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies (2013) Google Scholar
  • 27. R. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2002) Google Scholar
  • 28. R.K. Yin, Qualitative Research from Start to Finish (2011) Google Scholar
  • 29. B. Zimmerman, '‘Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: AN overview’' Educational Psychologist (1990) Google Scholar
  • 30. B. Zimmerman, M. Martinez-Pons, '‘Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies’' American Educational Research Journal (1986) Google Scholar