Skip to main content
No Access

Disciplinary differentiation and institutional independence: a viable template for a pluralist economics

Published Online:pp 120-132

This paper surveys the teaching of pluralist economics in Australian universities with a particular focus on explaining growth and decline. The paper also presents the results of a survey of staff teaching pluralist economics1 to assess their background and views on the state of economics teaching. The key finding of our survey is that the most promising pathway to a genuinely pluralist economics appears to be disciplinary differentiation and institutional independence: disciplinary differentiation by teaching a pluralist economics under the subject ‘political economy’, and institutional independence by basing teaching in faculties of arts and social science away from economics departments and business faculties.

Keywords

pluralism, heterodox economics, political economy, teaching, pedagogy, curriculum

References

  • 1. Argyrous, G. (1996). ‘Teaching political economy at UNSW’. paper presented to Political Economy Twentieth Anniversary Conference, 2 July, University of Sydney Google Scholar
  • 2. Argyrous, G. (2006). ‘Alternative approaches to teaching introductory economics courses in Australian Universities’. Australasian Journal of Economics Education. 3, 1–2, 58-74 Google Scholar
  • 3. Australian Bureau of Statistics 3101.0 – Australian Demographic Statistics. 2013, 06, Canberra:Australian Bureau of Statistics Google Scholar
  • 4. Butler, G. , Jones, E. , Stilwell, F. (2009). Political Economy Now! The Struggle for Alternative Economics at the University of Sydney. Sydney:Darlington Press Google Scholar
  • 5. Earl, P.E , Peng, T. (2012). ‘Brands of Economics and the Trojan Horse of Pluralism’. Review of Political Economy. 24, 3, 451-467 Google Scholar
  • 6. Harcourt, G.C. ‘40 years of teaching post-Keynesian themes in Adelaide and Cambridge’. History of Economics Review. 2001, Winter, 31, 95-109 Google Scholar
  • 7. Hogan, W.P. (1974). A Statement by Professor Warren P. Hogan. University of Sydney Archives, University of Sydney Google Scholar
  • 8. Keen, S. ‘The self-Cannibalisation of economics’. Business Spectator. 2013, 07, 08, [online] http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2013/7/8/economy/self-cannibalisation-economics Google Scholar
  • 9. Lodewijks, J. ‘Political economy in Greater Western Sydney’. Journal of Australian Political Economy. 2013, Summer, 72, 80-105 Google Scholar
  • 10. Rodrigo, D. , Butler, G. Jones, E. Stilwell, F. (2009). ‘Keeping the political economy movement flourishing’. Political Economy Now! The Struggle for Alternative Economics at the University of Sydney. Sydney:Darlington Press , 156-158 Google Scholar
  • 11. Spies-Butcher, B. , Paton, J. , Cahill, D. (2012). Market Society: History, Theory, Practice. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
  • 12. Stilwell, F. (2011a). Political Economy: The Contest of Economic Ideas. South Melbourne:Oxford University Press Google Scholar
  • 13. Stilwell, F. (2011b). ‘Teaching a pluralist course in economics: the University of Sydney experience’. International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education. 2, 1, 39-56 AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Stilwell, F. , Argyrous, G. (2011). Economics as a Social Science: Readings in Political Economy. Melbourne:Tilde University Press Google Scholar
  • 15. Stretton, H. (1996). ‘After Samuelson?’. World Development. 24, 10, 1561-1578 Google Scholar
  • 16. Thornton, T. (2012). ‘The economics curriculum in Australian Universities 1980 to 2011’. Economic Papers. 31, 1, 103-113 Google Scholar
  • 17. Thornton, T. ‘The narrowing of the Australian University economics curriculum: an analysis of the problem and a proposed solution’. Economic Record. 2013a, 06, 89, 106-114 Google Scholar
  • 18. Thornton, T. (2013b). The Possibility of a Pluralist Economics Curriculum in Australian Universities: Historical Forces and Contemporary Strategies. Melbourne:La Trobe University , PhD thesis Google Scholar