Skip to main content
Skip main navigation
No Access

Does informal learning benefit from interactivity? The effect of trial and error on knowledge acquisition during a museum visit

Published Online:pp 158-175https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2013.055620

Informal learning settings, such as museums and cultural heritage locations, have employed interactive mobile applications. Educators and museum curators recognise the value of interactivity, but the optimum level of interactivity in informal learning remains unclear. We developed an informal learning activity with quiz questions about art theory, which we integrated in a between-groups experimental design with three groups of high-school students at an art gallery. Each of the three groups received a different treatment: (a) an interactive mobile-based learning activity, (b) a paper-based version of the same learning activity, and (c) a self-guided museum tour. Students who enrolled with the interactive version showed higher performance in the post-assessment test when compared to the paper-based version. Notably, the benefits of the interactive version are attributed to the immediate feedback of the quiz application during the visit. Further research should perform similar controlled experiments in order to assess the learning benefit of more immersive interactive systems, such as three-dimensional graphics and augmented reality.

Keywords

mobile learning, interactivity, trial and error, informal learning, knowledge acquisition, perceptions, museum

References

  • 1. Antal, M. , Koncz, S. (2011). ‘Student modeling for a web-based self-assessment system’. Expert Systems with Applications. 38, 6, 6492-6497 Google Scholar
  • 2. Cabrera, J.S. , Frutos, H.M. , Stoica, A.G. , Avouris, N. , Dimitriadis, Y. , Fiotakis, G. , Liveri, K.D. (2005). ‘Mystery in the museum: collaborative learning activities using handheld devices’. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services (MobileHCI ’05). ACM Press, 315-318 Google Scholar
  • 3. Chen, Y. , Kao, T. , Sheu, J.A. (2003). ‘Mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 19, 1, 347-359 Google Scholar
  • 4. Chu, H.C. , Hwang, G.J. , Tsai, C.C. (2010). ‘A knowledge engineering approach to developing Mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning’. Computers & Education. 54, 1, 289-297 Google Scholar
  • 5. Cook, T.D. , Shadish, W. , Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin Google Scholar
  • 6. Denton, P. , Madden, J. , Roberts, M. , Rowe, P. (2008). ‘Students’ response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: a comparative case study’. British Journal of Educational Technology. 39, 2, 486-500 Google Scholar
  • 7. Dewey, J. (1966). Lectures in the Philosophy of Education. New York:Random House Google Scholar
  • 8. Gibbs, G. , Habeshaw, T. (1993). Preparing to Teach: An Introduction to Effective Teaching in Higher Education. Bristol:Technical & Educational Services Google Scholar
  • 9. Harackiewicz, J.M. , Durik, A.M. , Barron, K.E. , Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. , Tauer, J.M. (2008). ‘The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest and performance’. Journal of Educational Psychology. 100, 1, 105-122 Google Scholar
  • 10. Horn, M. , Atrash Leong, Z. , Block, F. , Diamond, J. , Evans, E.M. , Phillips, B. , Shen, C. (2012). ‘Of bats and apes: an interactive tabletop game for natural history museums’. Proceeding of CHI 2012. ACM Press, 2059-2068 Google Scholar
  • 11. Hsi, H. (2003). ‘A study of user experiences mediated by nomadic web content in a museum’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 19, 3, 308-319 Google Scholar
  • 12. Huang, Y. , Lin, Y. , Cheng, S. (2010). ‘Effectiveness of a mobile plant learning system in a science curriculum in Taiwanese elementary education’. Computers & Education. 54, 1, 47-58 Google Scholar
  • 13. Hulleman, C.S. , Durik, A.M. , Schweigert, S.B. , Harackiewicz, J.M. (2008). ‘Task values, achievement goals and interest: an integrative analysis’. Journal of Educational Psychology. 100, 2, 398-416 Google Scholar
  • 14. Hwang, G.J. , Chang, H.F. (2011). ‘A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students’. Computers & Education. 56, 1, 1023-1031 Google Scholar
  • 15. Hwang, G.J. , Chu, H.C. , Lin, Y.S. , Tsai, C.C. (2011a). ‘A knowledge acquisition approach to developing Mindtools for organizing and sharing differentiating knowledge in a ubiquitous learning environment’. Computers & Education. 57, 1, 1368-1377 Google Scholar
  • 16. Hwang, G.J. , Tsai, C.C. , Yang, S.J.H. (2008). ‘Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning’. Educational Technology & Society. 11, 2, 81-91 Google Scholar
  • 17. Hwang, G.J. , Wu, P.H. , Ke, H.R. (2011b). ‘An interactive concept map approach to supporting mobile learning activities for natural science courses’. Computers & Education. 57, 4, 2272-2280 Google Scholar
  • 18. Kao, G.Y.M. , Lin, S.S.J. , Sun, C.T. (2008). ‘Breaking concept boundaries to enhance creative potential: using integrated concept maps for conceptual self-awareness’. Computers & Education. 51, 3, 1718-1728 Google Scholar
  • 19. Klopfer, E. , Perry, J. , Squire, K. , Jan, M.F. , Steinkuehler, C. (2005). ‘Mystery at the museum: a collaborative game for museum education’. Proceedings of CSCL 2005. 316-320 Google Scholar
  • 20. Looi, C-K. , Seow, P. , Zhang, B. , So, H-J. , Chen, W. , Wong, L-H. (2010). ‘Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: a research agenda’. British Journal of Educational Technology. 42, 1, 154-169 Google Scholar
  • 21. Looi, C.K. , Wong, L.H. , Soa, H.J. , Seow, P. , Toh, Y. , Chen, W. , Zhang, B. , Norris, C. , Soloway, E. (2009). ‘Anatomy of a mobilized lesson: learning my way’. Computers & Education. 53, 4, 1120-1132 Google Scholar
  • 22. Marczyk, G. , DeMatteo, D. , Festinger, D. (2005). Essentials of Research Design and Methodology. New York:John Wiley Google Scholar
  • 23. Naismith, L. , Lonsdale, P. , Vavoula, G. , Sharples, M. (2004). ‘Literature review in mobile technologies and learning’. NESTA FutureLab Series Report 11. (accessed on 25 September 12), Available online at: http://elearning.typepad.com/thelearnedman/mobile_learning/reports/futurelab_review_11.pdf Google Scholar
  • 24. Ogata, H. , Li, M. , Hou, B. , Uosaki, N. , El-Bishouty, M. , Yano, Y. (2011). ‘SCROLL: supporting to share and reuse ubiquitous learning log in the context of language learning’. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. 6, 2, 69-82 Google Scholar
  • 25. Oblinger, D. (2004). ‘The next generation of educational engagement’. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 8, 1-18 Google Scholar
  • 26. Rogers, Y. , Brown, K. (2006). ‘An introduction to distributed cognition and communication’. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford:Elsevier , 181-202 Google Scholar
  • 27. Roussou, M. (2004). ‘Learning by doing and learning through play: an exploration of interactivity in virtual environments for children’. Computers in Entertainment. 2, 1, Google Scholar
  • 28. Siau, K. , Sheng, H. , Nah, F. (2006). ‘Use of classroom response system to enhance classroom interactivity’. IEEE Transactions on Education. 49, 3, 398-403 Google Scholar
  • 29. Sung, Y.T. , Chang, K.E. , Hou, H.T. , Chen, P.F. (2010). ‘Designing an electronic guidebook for learning engagement in a museum of history’. Computers in Human Behavior. 26, 3, 74-83 Google Scholar
  • 30. Toothacker, L.E. (1993). Multiple Comparisons Procedures. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Google Scholar
  • 31. Vavoula, G. , Scanlon, E. , Lonsdale, P. , Sharples, M. , Jones, A. (2005). ‘Report on empirical work with mobile learning and literature on mobile learning in science’. Jointly Executed Integrated Research Projects (JEIRP). D33.2 Google Scholar
  • 32. Wenger, E. , Snyder, W. (2000). ‘Communities of practice: the organizational frontier’. Harvard Business Review. 78, 1, 139-145 Google Scholar

Additional References