Skip to main content
Skip main navigation
No Access

Benchmarking external product variety in the Austrian agricultural industry

Published Online:pp 129-142https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2013.053753

High external variety is one of the main challenges to be faced within value networks. However, in practice there is a notable failure to manage this increasingly high variety and to embed variety management approaches in company structures. Therefore, the purpose of the paper is to present a benchmarking study of external product variety in the Austrian agricultural sector. In addition, a longitudinal case study showing the development of external variety in proportion to financial parameters in a specific company over the last ten years is executed. Finally the paper gives an overview of existing and planned variety management approaches in the company studied.

Keywords

variety, external product variety, variety management, value network, benchmarking study, data envelopment analysis, DEA, complexity, product complexity, value network complexity, logistics systems

References

  • 1. Abdelkafi, N. , Blecker, T. (2008). Variety-induced Complexity in Mass Customization: Concepts and Management. 7, Berlin:Schmidt , Techn., Univ., Inst. für Logistik und Unternehmensführung, Diss., Hamburg-Harburg, Operations and Technology Management Google Scholar
  • 2. Adebanjo, D. , Abbas, A. , Mann, R. (2010). ‘An investigation of the adoption and implementation of benchmarking’. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 30, 11, 1140-1169 Google Scholar
  • 3. Anand, G. , Kodali, R. (2008). ‘Benchmarking the benchmarking models’. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 15, 3, 257-291 Google Scholar
  • 4. Anderson, K. , McAdam, R. (2007). ‘Reconceptualising benchmarking development in UK organisations: the effects of size and sector’. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 56, 7, 538-558 Google Scholar
  • 5. Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Management Techniques: A Comprehensive Guide to Achieving Managerial Excellence and Improved Decision Making. Rev. 3rd ed., London:Kogan Page Google Scholar
  • 6. Blecker, T. , Abdelkafi, N. (2006). ‘Complexity and variety in mass customization systems: analysis and recommendations’. Management Decision. 44, 7, 908-929 Google Scholar
  • 7. Camp, R.C. (1989). Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices that Lead to Superior Performance. White Plains, NY:ASQC Quality Press Google Scholar
  • 8. Chakravarty, A.K. , Balakrishnan, N. (2001). ‘Achieving product variety through optimal choice of module variations’. IIE Transactions. 33, 7, 587-598 Google Scholar
  • 9. Danese, P. , Romano, P. (2004). ‘Improving inter-functional coordination to face high product variety and frequent modifications’. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 24, 9, 863-885 Google Scholar
  • 10. Ding, F-Y. , Sun, H. , Kallaus, J. (2007). ‘Analysing product complexity related to product variety in a manufacturing firm with a case study at an automobile assembly plant’. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management. 3, 3, 356-377 AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • 11. Ehrlenspiel, K. , Kiewert, A. , Lindemann, U. (2005). Kostengünstig Entwickeln und Konstruieren: Kostenmanagement bei der integrierten Produktentwicklung, VDI-Buch. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag Google Scholar
  • 12. Er, M. , MacCarthy, B. (2006). ‘Managing product variety in multinational corporation supply chains: a simulation study’. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 17, 8, 1117-1138 Google Scholar
  • 13. Fisher, M. , Ramdas, K. , Ulrich, K. (1999). ‘Component sharing in the management of product variety: a study of automotive braking systems’. Management Science. 45, 3, 297-315 Google Scholar
  • 14. Fong, S.W. , Cheng, E.W.L. , Ho, D.C.K. (1998). ‘Benchmarking: a general reading for management practitioners’. Management Decision. 36, 6, 407-418 Google Scholar
  • 15. Forza, C. , Salvador, F. (2002). ‘Managing for variety in the order acquisition and fulfilment process: the contribution of product configuration systems’. International Journal of Production Economics. 76, 1, 87-98 Google Scholar
  • 16. Gagnon, J.E. (2007). ‘Productive capacity, product varieties and the elasticities approach to the trade balance’. Review of International Economics. 15, 4, 639-659 Google Scholar
  • 17. Hu, S.J. , Zhu, X. , Wang, H. , Koren, Y. (2008). ‘Product variety and manufacturing complexity in assembly systems and supply chains’. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology. 57, 1, 45-48 Google Scholar
  • 18. Lauras, M. , Pingaud, H. , Lamothe, J. (2009). ‘An approach to diagnose local and collaborative supply chain processes’. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management. 5, 3, 375-395 AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • 19. Lee, H.L. , Tang, C.S. (1997). ‘Modelling the costs and benefits of delayed product differentiation’. Management Science. 43, 1, 40 Google Scholar
  • 20. Pil, F.K. , Holweg, M. (2004). ‘Linking product variety to order-fulfillment strategies’ interfaces’. 34, 5, 394-403 Google Scholar
  • 21. Ramdas, K. (2003). ‘Managing product variety: an integrative review and research directions’. Production & Operations Management. 12, 1, 79-101 Google Scholar
  • 22. Ramdas, K. , Fisher, M. , Ulrich, K. (2003). ‘Managing variety for assembled products: modeling component systems sharing’. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 5, 2, 142 Google Scholar
  • 23. Smith, A.D. (2011). ‘Managing supply chain complexities and integration issues for competitive advantage: a comparative analysis’. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management. 9, 3, 351-374 AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • 24. Sun, H. , Ding, F-Y. (2010). ‘Extended data envelopment models and a practical tool to analyse product complexity related to product variety for an automobile assembly plant’. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management. 6, 1, 99-112 AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • 25. Swaminathan, J.M. , Nitsch, T.R. (2007). ‘Managing product variety in automobile assembly: the importance of the sequencing point’. Interfaces. 37, 4, 324-333 Google Scholar
  • 26. Swaminathan, J.M. , Tayur, S.R. (1998). ‘Managing Broader product lines through delayed differentiation using vanilla boxes’. Management Science. 44, 12, S161 Google Scholar
  • 27. Thonemann, U.W. , Bradley, J.R. (2002). ‘The effect of product variety on supply-chain performance’. European Journal of Operational Research. 143, 3, 548-569 Google Scholar
  • 28. Traxler, R. , Engelhardt-Nowitzki, C. , Engelhardt-Nowitzki, C. Kohlberger, R. Traxler, R. (2011). ‘Adaptiver Produktkonfigurator. Potentiale am Beispiel eines Premiumproduzenten im Landmaschinensektor’. Forschungsinitiative AGTIL 2011: Beiträge zur Stärkung der Veränderungsfähigkeit von Unternehmen. Aachen:Shaker Verlag , 51-64 Google Scholar
  • 29. Vaagen, H. , Wallace, S.W. (2008). ‘Product variety arising from hedging in the fashion supply chains. Special section on logistics management in fashion retail supply chains’. International Journal of Production Economics. 114, 2, 431-455 Google Scholar
  • 30. Wiendahl, H-P. (2004). Variantenbeherrschung in der Montage: Konzept und Praxis der flexiblen Produktionsendstufe, Engineering online library. Berlin:Springer Google Scholar
  • 31. Wildemann, H. (2009). Komplexitätsmanagement: In Vertrieb, Beschaffung, Produkt, Entwicklung und Produktion, Leitfaden/TCW Transfer-Centrum für Produktions-Logistik und Technologie-Management. 49, München:Aufl. TCW Transfer-Centrum Verl. , 10 Google Scholar
  • 32. Wong, W.P. , Wong, K.Y. (2008). ‘A review on benchmarking of supply chain performance measures’. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 15, 1, 25-51 Google Scholar