-1679476342.png){kind=logo}
Abstract
Although two centuries have passed since the French codifiers stated the principle of strict liability in tort, regulatory texts proposed by the new Civil Code remain largely trapped in the same conception of civil liability, seen from the perspective of the perpetrator/offender who has to be punished for his reprehensible and unlawful act, a liability mainly under a sanction with a primarily educational purpose. This study aims to assess new regulatory solutions viewed from a different perspective, that of the victim who aspires to indemnification, indicating some flaws of the new provisions, generated not only by incorrect correlation of some statements, but also by an insufficient process of elaboration, promoting in the same time, some proposals of lex ferenda.
Keywords
References
- 1. (2008).
‘Răspunderea civilă delictuală obiectivă’.
The objective delictual civil liability) , 502, op. cit. Google Scholar - 2. (2001). ‘Flexible droit. Pour une sociologie du droit sans rigueur’. 10-e édition, LGDJ, 78 Google Scholar
- 3. (2001). PUF, La construction de la responsabilité civile Google Scholar
- 4. (1972). 197, op. cit. Google Scholar
- 5. (1933). RTDC, 627, Le fondement de la responsabilité contractuelle Google Scholar
- 6. Ibide Google Scholar
- 7. 28 Idem Google Scholar
- 8. (1931). Rapports et domains des reponsabilité contractuelle et delictuelle, Sirey, p.V Google Scholar
- 9. (2001).
‘Drept civil. Teoria generală a obligaţiilor’, ‘Reflecţii privind’.
(Civil law. General theory of obligations), (Reflections regarding…) Google Scholar - 10. ‘Discussions de lege lata concerning the recognize of the existence of a principle of delictual civil liability for the action of another consecrated in the Romanian Civil Code’. 55-73, 8/2004, Law no. 8/2004 Google Scholar
- 11. (2007).
‘Reglementarea răspunderii subsidiare’.
(The regulation of the subsidiar liability) , 42, op. cit. Google Scholar - 12. (1/1982).
Cluj – Napoca:Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai
,
45-49,
Series Jurisprudentia, nr. 1/1982 , Concerning the foundation of the liability without a guilt of the parents for the prejudices caused by their minor children Google Scholar - 13. (2004). ‘Le préjudice dans le droit civil de la responsabilité’. LGDJ. 4 Google Scholar
- 14. (2004). 190, op. cit. Google Scholar
- 15. (2008).
Introducere în Dreptul Civil.
(Intriduction in the Civil Law) , ediţia a 2-a revăzută şi adăugată, Cluj-Napoca:Ed. Colecţia Universitaria , 357, Sfera juridică Google Scholar - 16. (1999).
‘Vinovăţia în dreptul civil român’.
(The culpability in the Romanian civil law) , Bucureşti:Editura Al. Beck , 76 Google Scholar - 17. (1974). Rodstein, 7, Essai d’une théorie générale, de la responsabilité civile considérée en sa double function de garantie et de peine privée Google Scholar
- 18. (1999). 657-661, op. cit. Google Scholar
- 19. (2000). Dalloz, 22-1087, Droit de la responsabilité et des contrats Google Scholar
- 20. (1965). LGDJ, Le déclin de la responsabilité individuelle Google Scholar
- 21. (1985). ‘La réparation des dommages causés sous l’impire d’un, état d’inconscience: un trasfert nécéssaire de la responsabilité vers l’assurance’. I, 3189, Iuris-classeur périodique Google Scholar
