Skip to main content
Search
Search
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Skip main navigation
No Access

Obtaining information in emergency management: a case study from an Australian emergency operations centre

Published Online:November 18, 2013pp 131-158https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHFE.2013.057614

Abstract

Stakeholders involved in emergency management multi-agency coordination require information to inform their situation awareness to plan and coordinate their response and mitigation strategies. This study investigates the perceived information requirements of senior strategic level emergency management personnel and how they obtain this information. The results are based on empirical data from two sources: an organisational survey and observational study during an emergency event. The findings indicate that the most influential cognitive artefacts used to obtain information are in person communication and use of specialised application software. However, challenges associated with using the latter can result in an increased use of in person communication which can limit the exchange of information throughout the system of actors. Understanding the strengths and limitations of how these stakeholders obtain information in this Australian emergency operations centre to inform their situation awareness is essential in facilitating multi-agency coordination in this environment.

Keywords

situation awareness, emergency management, emergency operations centre, multi-agency coordination, cognitive artefacts

References

  • 1. Aedo, I. , et al. (2010). ‘End-user oriented strategies to facilitate multi-organizational adoption of emergency management information systems’. Information Processing & Management. 46, 1, 11-21 Google Scholar
  • 2. Baber, C. , et al. , Loffler, J. Klann, M. (2007). ‘Supporting implicit coordination between teams in disaster management’. Mobile Response. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag , 39-50 Google Scholar
  • 3. Baruch, Y. , Holtom, B.C. (2008). ‘Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research’. Human Relations. 61, 8, 1139-1160 Google Scholar
  • 4. Berlin, J. , Carlström, E. (2008). ‘The 90 second collaboration: a critical study of collaboration exercises at extensive accident sites’. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 16, 4, 177-185 Google Scholar
  • 5. Bernard, E.N. , et al. (1988). ‘On mitigating rapid onset natural disasters: project THRUST (Tsunami Hazards Reduction Utilizing Systems Technology)’. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 69, 24, 649, 659-651, 661 Google Scholar
  • 6. Bharosa, N. , Janssen, M. , Tan, Y.H. (2011). ‘A research agenda for information quality assurance in public safety networks: information orchestration as the middle ground between hierarchical and netcentric approaches’. Cognition, Technology & Work. 13, 3, 203-216 Google Scholar
  • 7. Boy, G. (2011). The Handbook of Human-Machine Interaction: A Human-Centered Design Approach. Farnham, Surrey:Ashgate Publishing Ltd. Google Scholar
  • 8. Burke, C. , et al. (2006). Understanding team adaption: a conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology. 91, 6, 1189-1207 Google Scholar
  • 9. Caldwell, K. , Atwal, A. (2005). ‘Non-participant observation: using video tapes to collect data in nursing research’. Nurse Researcher. 13, 2, 42-54 Google Scholar
  • 10. Carlson, M.D. , Morrison, R.S. (2009). ‘Study design, precision and validity in observational studies’. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 12, 1, 77-82 Google Scholar
  • 11. Coates, G. , et al. (2011). ‘Adaptive co-ordinated emergency response to rapidly evolving large-scale unprecedented events (REScUE)’. in 8th International ISCRAM Conference, 1-5 Google Scholar
  • 12. Comfort, L. , Kapucu, N. (2006). ‘Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: the World Trade Center attacks, September 11, 2001’. Natural Hazards. 39, 2, 309-327 Google Scholar
  • 13. Comfort, L. , et al. (2004). ‘Coordination in complex systems: increasing efficiency in disaster mitigation and response’. International Journal of Emergency Management. 2, 1–2, 62-80 Abstract, Google Scholar
  • 14. Cruz, M.G. , et al. (2012). ‘Anatomy of a catastrophic wildfire: the Black Saturday Kilmore East fire in Victoria, Australia’. Forest Ecology and Management. 284, 269-285 Google Scholar
  • 15. Endsley, M.R. (1995). ‘Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems’. Human Factors. 37, 1, 32-64 Google Scholar
  • 16. Fleiss, J. , Levin, B. , Paik, M. (2003). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 3rd ed., Hoboken, NJ, USA:John Wiley and Sons Google Scholar
  • 17. Flin, R. , Arbuthnot, K. (2002). Incident Command: Tales from the Hot Seat. Aldershot:Ashgate Publishing Ltd. Google Scholar
  • 18. Gold, R.L. (1958). ‘Roles in sociological field observations’. Social Forces. 36, 3, 217-223 Google Scholar
  • 19. Harrald, J.R. (2006). ‘Agility and discipline: critical success factors for disaster response’. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 604, 1, 256-272 Google Scholar
  • 20. Helsloot, I. (2008). ‘Coordination is a prerequisite for good collaboration, isn’t it?’. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 16, 4, 173-176 Google Scholar
  • 21. Hoc, J.M. (1996). Supervision et Controle de Processus: La Cognition en Situation Dynamique. Grenoble:Presse Universitaire de Grenoble Google Scholar
  • 22. Hollnagel, E. (2001). ‘Extended cognition and the future of ergonomics’. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 2, 3, 309-315 Google Scholar
  • 23. International Organization for Standardization (2011). Societal Security – Emergency Management – Requirements for Incident Response. ISO 22320:2011 Google Scholar
  • 24. Janssen, M. , et al. (2010). ‘Advances in multi-agency disaster management: key elements in disaster research’. Information Systems Frontiers. 12, 1, 1-7 Google Scholar
  • 25. Jenkins, D.P. , Salmon, P.M. , Stanton, N.a , Walker, G.H. (2010). ‘A new approach for designing cognitive artefacts to support disaster management’. Ergonomics. 53, 5, 617-35 Google Scholar
  • 26. Johnson, D. , et al. (2011). ‘Improved situational awareness in emergency management through automated data analysis and modeling’. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. 8, 1, Article 40 Google Scholar
  • 27. Kapucu, N. (2006). ‘Interagency communication networks during emergencies: boundary spanners in multiagency coordination’. The American Review of Public Administration. 36, 2, 207-225 Google Scholar
  • 28. Kapucu, N. , Van Wart, M. (2006). ‘The evolving role of the public sector in managing catastrophic disasters: lessons learned’. Administration & Society. 38, 3, 279-308 Google Scholar
  • 29. Kawulich, B. (2005). ‘Participant observation as a data collection method’. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 6, 2, Article 43 Google Scholar
  • 30. Kirwan, B. , Ainsworth, L. (1992). A Guide to Task Analysis. London:Taylor and Francis Google Scholar
  • 31. Klein, G. , et al. (1993). Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. Norwood, NJ:Ablex Publishing Co. Google Scholar
  • 32. Kruchten, P. , et al. (2008). ‘A conceptual model of disasters encompassing multiple stakeholder domains’. International Journal of Emergency Management. 5, 1/2, 25-56 Abstract, Google Scholar
  • 33. Landis, J. , Koch, G. (1977). ‘The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data’. Biometrics. 33, 1, 159-174 Google Scholar
  • 34. Laxmisan, A. , et al. (2006). ‘The multitasking clinician: decision-making and cognitive demand during and after team handoffs in emergency care’. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 76, 11–12, 801-11 Google Scholar
  • 35. Ley, B. , et al. (2012). ‘Supporting improvisation work in inter-organizational crisis management’. in Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI ‘12. New York, New York, USA:ACM Press , 1529-1538 Google Scholar
  • 36. Lutz, L.D. , Lindell, M.K. (2008). ‘Incident command system as a response model within emergency operation centers during hurricane Rita’. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 16, 3, 122-134 Google Scholar
  • 37. Manoj, B.S. , Baker, A.H. (2007). ‘Communication challenges in emergency response’. Communications of the ACM. 50, 3, 51 Google Scholar
  • 38. McEntire, D.A. (2002). ‘Coordinating multi-organisational responses to disaster: lessons from the March 28, 2000, Fort Worth Tornado’. Disaster Prevention and Management. 11, 5, 369-379 Google Scholar
  • 39. McMaster, R. , Baber, Chris , Duffy, T. ‘The role of artefacts in Police emergency response sense making’. in Proceedings of the 9th International ISCRAM Conference. 2012, 04, Vancouver, Canada, 1-10 Google Scholar
  • 40. Militello, L.G. , et al. (2007). ‘Information flow during crisis management: challenges to coordination in the emergency operations center’. Cognition, Technology & Work. 9, 1, 25-31 Google Scholar
  • 41. Millot, P. , Debernard, S. , Vanderhaegan, F. , Boy, GA (2011). ‘Authority and cooperation between humans and machines’. The Handbook of Human-machine Interaction: A Human-Centred Approach. Farnham, Surrey:Ashgate Publishing Ltd. , 207-234 Google Scholar
  • 42. Mishra, J.L. , Allen, D.K. , Pearman, A.D. (2011). ‘Information sharing during multi-agency major incidents’. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 48, 1, 1-10 Google Scholar
  • 43. Moynihan, D.P. (2007). From Forest Fires to Hurricane Katrina: Case Studies of Incident Command Systems. Washington DC Google Scholar
  • 44. Norman, D.A. , Carroll, J. (1991). ‘Cognitive artifacts’. Designing Interaction: Psychology at The Human-computer Interface. New York:Cambridge University Press , 17-38 Google Scholar
  • 45. O’Reilly, C. (1980). ‘Individuals and information overload in organizations: is more necessarily better?’. Academy of Management Journal. 23, 4, 684-696 Google Scholar
  • 46. Omelicheva, M.Y. (2011). ‘Natural disasters: triggers of political instability?’. International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations. 37, 4, 441-465 Google Scholar
  • 47. Owen, C. , et al. (2013). ‘Developing a theoretical model of complex multi-team coordination in emergency management’. International Journal of Emergency Management. 9, 1, 1-17 Abstract, Google Scholar
  • 48. Pasquero, J. (1991). ‘Supraorganizational collaboration: the Canadian environmental experiment’. Journal of Applied Behavioral Scienceral Science. 27, 1, 38-64 Google Scholar
  • 49. Paton, D. , Flin, R. (1999). ‘Disaster stress: an emergency management perspective’. Disaster Prevention and Management. 8, 4, 261-267 Google Scholar
  • 50. Raj, A.K. , Doyle, M.J. , Cameron, J.D. (2011). ‘Psychphysiology and performance: considerations for human-centered design’. in The Handbook of Human-Machine Interaction: A Human-Centred Approach. Farnham:Ashgate , 53-74 Google Scholar
  • 51. Reddick, C. (2011). ‘Information technology and emergency management: preparedness and planning in US states’. Disasters. 35, 1, 45-61 Google Scholar
  • 52. Reid, J. (2006). Addressing Lessons from the Emergency Response to the 7 July 2005 London Bombings: What We Learned and What We are Doing About It. London Google Scholar
  • 53. Russo, J. (1974). ‘More information is better: a reevaluation of Jacoby, Speller and Kohn’. Journal of Consumer Research. 1, 3, 68-72 Google Scholar
  • 54. Salas, E. Klein, G. (2001). Linking Expertise and Naturalistic Decision Making. Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Google Scholar
  • 55. Salas, E. , et al. (2007). ‘Markers for enhancing team cognition in complex environments: the power of team performance’. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine. 78, 5, 77-85 Google Scholar
  • 56. Salmon, P. , et al. (2011). ‘Coordination during multi-agency emergency response: issues and solutions’. Disaster Prevention and Management. 20, 2, 140-158 Google Scholar
  • 57. Saoud, N.B. , et al. (2006). ‘Assessing large scale emergency rescue plans: an agent based approach’. International Journal of Intelligent Control Systems. 11, 4, 260-271 Google Scholar
  • 58. Sarter, N. , Woods, D. (1991). ‘Situation awareness: a critical but ill-defined phenomenon’. International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 1, 1, 45-57 Google Scholar
  • 59. Scholtens, A. (2008). ‘Controlled collaboration in disaster and crisis management in the Netherlands, history and practice of an overestimated and underestimated concept’. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 16, 4, 195-207 Google Scholar
  • 60. Schraagen, J.M. , Van de Ven, J. (2008). ‘Improving decision making in crisis response through critical thinking support’. Human Factors. 2, 4, 311-327 Google Scholar
  • 61. Schraagen, J.M. , Huis, M. , De Koning, L. (2010). ‘Information sharing during crisis management in hierarchical vs. network teams’. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 18, 2, 117-127 Google Scholar
  • 62. Smith, K. , Hancock, P. (1995). ‘Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness’. Human Factors. 37, 1, 137-148 Google Scholar
  • 63. Sommer, M. , Njå, O. (2012). ‘Dominant learning processes in emergency response organizations: a case study of a joint rescue coordination centre’. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 20, 4, 219-230 Google Scholar
  • 64. Stanton, N. , et al. (2009). Digitalising Command and Control: A Human Factors and Ergonomics Analysis of Mission Planning and Battlespace Management. Farnham, Surrey:Ashgate Publishing Ltd. Google Scholar
  • 65. Teague, B. , McLeod, R. , Pascoe, S. (2010). 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission Final Report. Melbourne Google Scholar
  • 66. Todd, P. , Gigerenzer, G. (2001). ‘Putting naturalistic decision making into the adaptive toolbox’. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 14, 5, 381-383 Google Scholar
  • 67. Tsang, P. , Wilson, G. , Salvendy, G. (1997). ‘Mental workload’. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. New York:Plenum , 417-449 Google Scholar
  • 68. Turoff, M. , Chumer, M. , Hiltz, R. , et al. (2004a). ‘Assuring homeland security: continuous monitoring, control & assurance of emergency preparedness’. Journal of Information. 6, 3, 1-24 Google Scholar
  • 69. Turoff, M. , Chumer, M. , Van de Walle, B. , et al. (2004b). ‘The design of a dynamic emergency response management information system’. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application. 5, 4, 1-36 Google Scholar
  • 70. Van de Walle, B. , Turoff, M. (2008). ‘Decision support for emergency situations’. Information Systems and e-Business Management. 6, 3, 295-316 Google Scholar
  • 71. Van Scotter, J. , Pawlowski, S. , Cu, T. (2012). ‘An examination of interdependencies among major barriers to coordination in disaster response’. International Journal of Emergency Management. 8, 4, 281-307 Google Scholar
  • 72. Vicente, K. (1999). Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive and Healthy Computer-based Work. Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Google Scholar
  • 73. Wears, R.L. , et al. (2006). ‘Emergency department status boards: user-evolved artefacts for inter- and intra-group coordination’. Cognition, Technology & Work. 9, 3, 163-170 Google Scholar
  • 74. Wilson, S. , Galliers, S. , Fone, J. (2007). ‘Cognitive artifacts in support of medical shift handover: an in use, in situ evaluation’. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 22, 1–2, 59-80 Google Scholar
  • 75. Wise, C.R. (2006). ‘Organizing for homeland security after Katrina: is adaptive management what’s missing?’. Public Administration Review. 66, 3, 302-318 Google Scholar
  • 76. Xiao, Y. (2005). ‘Artifacts and collaborative work in healthcare: methodological, theoretical and technological implications of the tangible’. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 38, 1, 26-33 Google Scholar
  • 77. Zsambok, C. , Klein, G. (1997). Naturalistic Decision Making. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Google Scholar
Previous article
Next article