Skip to main content
Skip main navigation
Published Online:pp 511-524https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2012.050167

The paper examines the impact of key productivity determinants at the firm level using data on 24,257 Swedish micro firms, including approximately 194,000 observations for the 2007 to 2008 period. The regression model includes a firm-level measure of total factor productivity as the dependent variable and capital structure and other relevant control variables as independent variables. Analysis reveals that firm-level variables, such as lagged productivity, size, age, profitability, short-term debt ratio, and industry affiliation, significantly affect firm productivity. Agency cost theory seems applicable in partly explaining the relationship between capital structure and productivity.

Keywords

total factor productivity, TFP, firm performance, agency cost theory, capital structure, Sweden

References

  • 1. Abor, J. (2005). ‘The effect of capital structure on profitability: an empirical analysis of listed firms in Ghana’. Journal of Risk Finance. 6, 5, 438-445 Google Scholar
  • 2. Agell, J. (2004). ‘Why are small firms different? Managers’ views’. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 106, 3, 437-452 Google Scholar
  • 3. Aghion, P. , Bolton, P. (1992). ‘An incomplete contracts approach to financial contracting’. Review of Economic Studies. 59, 3, 473-494 Google Scholar
  • 4. Ang, J. , Cole, R. , Lin, J. (2000). ‘Agency costs and ownership structure’. Journal of Finance. 60, 1, 81-106 Google Scholar
  • 5. Bernard, A.B. , Jones, C.I. (1996). ‘Comparing apples to oranges: productivity convergence and measurement across industries and countries’. American Economic Review. 86, 5, 1216-1239 Google Scholar
  • 6. Bevan, A.A. , Danbolt, J. (2002). ‘Capital structure and its determinants in the UK – a decompositional analysis’. Applied Financial Economics. 12, 3, 159-170 Google Scholar
  • 7. Bonaccorsi, A. (1992). ‘On the relationship between firm size and export intensity’. Journal of International Business Studies. 23, 4, 605-635 Google Scholar
  • 8. Chell, E. (1985). ‘The entrepreneurial personality: a few ghosts laid to rest’. International Small Business Journal. 3, 3, 43-54 Google Scholar
  • 9. Chittenden, F. , Hall, G. , Hutchinson, P. (1996). ‘Small firm growth, access to capital markets and financial structure: review of issues and an empirical investigation’. Small Business Economics. 8, 1, 59-67 Google Scholar
  • 10. Demsetz, H. , Lehn, K. (1985). ‘The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences’. Journal of Political Economy. 93, 6, 1155-1177 Google Scholar
  • 11. Fama, E.F. , Jensen, M.C. (1983). ‘Agency problems and residual claims’. Journal of Law and Economics. 26, 2, 327-349 Google Scholar
  • 12. Fama, E.F. , French, K.R. (2002). ‘Testing tradeoff and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt’. The Review of Financial Studies. 15, 1, 1-33 Google Scholar
  • 13. Fama, E.F. , Miller, M.H. (1972). The Theory of Finance. New York:Holt, Rinehart, and Winston Google Scholar
  • 14. Gleason, K. , Mathur, L. , Mathur, I. (2000). ‘The interrelationship between culture, capital structure, and performance: evidence from European retailers’. Journal of Business Research. 50, 1, 185-191 Google Scholar
  • 15. Gorton, G. , Rosen, R. (1995). ‘Corporate control, portfolio choice, and the decline of banking’. Journal of Finance. 50, 5, 1377-1420 Google Scholar
  • 16. Gumbau, M. , Maudos, J. (2002). ‘The determinants of efficiency: the case of the Spanish industry’. Applied Economics. 34, 15, 1941-1948 Google Scholar
  • 17. Hall, G. , Hutchinson, P. , Michaelas, N. (2000). ‘Industry effects on the determinants of unquoted SMEs’ capital structure’. International Journal of the Economics of Business. 7, 3, 297-312 Google Scholar
  • 18. Hart, O. (1995). Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure. Oxford:Oxford University Press Google Scholar
  • 19. Hutchinson, R.W. (1995). ‘The capital structure and investment decision of the small owner-managed firm: some exploratory issues’. Small Business Economics. 7, 3, 231-129 Google Scholar
  • 20. Jensen, M. , Meckling, W. (1976). ‘Theory of the firm: managerial behavior’, agency costs and ownership structure’. Journal of Financial Economics. 3, 4, 305-360 Google Scholar
  • 21. Keeble, D. , Tyler, P. , Broom, G. , Lewis, J. (1992). Business Success in the Countryside: The Performance of Rural Enterprise. London:HMSO for DoE Google Scholar
  • 22. Kinsman, M. , Newman, J. (1999). ‘Debt level and corporate performance: an empirical analysis’. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Western Decision Sciences Institute. 6–10 April, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico Google Scholar
  • 23. Kumar, J. (2003). ‘Ownership structure and corporate firm performance’. EconWPA, Technical Report 0304004 Google Scholar
  • 24. Leibenstein, H. (1966). ‘Allocative efficiency vs. ‘x-efficiency’’. American Economic Review. 56, 3, 392-415 Google Scholar
  • 25. Lichtenberg, F. (1992). Corporate Takeovers and Productivity. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press Google Scholar
  • 26. Lumpkin, G.T. (1998). ‘Do new entrants have an entrepreneurial orientation?’. Paper presented at 1998 Academy of Management Meeting, San Diego, CA Google Scholar
  • 27. Lumpkin, G.T. , Dess, G.G. (1996). ‘Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance’. Academy of Management Review. 21, 1, 135-172 Google Scholar
  • 28. Majumdar, S. , Chhibber, A. (1999). ‘Capital structure and performance: evidence from a transition economy on an aspect of corporate governance’. Public Choice. 98, 3–4, 287-305 Google Scholar
  • 29. Mesquita, J.M.C. , Lara, J.E. (2003). ‘Capital structure and profitability: the Brazilian case’. Academy of Business and Administration Sciences Conference, 11–13 July, Vancouver Google Scholar
  • 30. Michaelas, N. , Chittenden, F. , Poutziouris, P. (1999). ‘Financial policy and capital structure choice in UK SMEs: empirical evidence from company panel data’. Small Business Economics. 12, 1, 113-130 Google Scholar
  • 31. Morck, R. , Shleifer, A. , Vishny, R.W. (1988). ‘Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis’. Journal of Financial Economics. 20, 1–2, 293-315 Google Scholar
  • 32. Nickell, S. , Nicolitsas, D. (1999). ‘How does financial pressure affect firms ?’. European Economic Review. 43, 1435-1456 Google Scholar
  • 33. Nickell, S. , Nicolitsas, D. , Dryden, N. (1997). ‘What makes firms perform well?’. European Economic Review. 41, 783-796 Google Scholar
  • 34. Pedersen, T. , Thomsen, S. (2003). ‘Ownership structure and value of the largest European firms: the importance of owner identity’. Journal of Management and Governance. 7, 1, 27-55 Google Scholar
  • 35. Peel, M.J. , Wilson, N. , Howorth, C. (2000). ‘Late payment and credit management in the small firm sector: some empirical evidence’. International Small Business Journal. 18, 1, 17-37 Google Scholar
  • 36. Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford:Basil Blackwell Google Scholar
  • 37. Pushner, G. (1995). ‘Equity ownership structure, leverage and productivity: empirical evidence from Japan’. Journal of Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 3, 2, 241-255 Google Scholar
  • 38. Rajan, R. , Zingales, L. (1995). ‘What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data’. Journal of Finance. 50, 5, 1421-1460 Google Scholar
  • 39. Shepherd, W.G. , De Jong, H.W. Shepherd, W.G. (1986). ‘On the core concepts of industrial economics’. Mainstreams in Industrial Organization. Dordrecht:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers Google Scholar
  • 40. Shleifer, A. , Vishny, R.W. (1997). ‘A survey of corporate governance’. The Journal of Finance. 52, 2, 737-783 Google Scholar
  • 41. Shrivastava, P. , Grant, J.H. (1985). ‘Empirically derived models of strategic decision-making processes’. Strategic Management Journal. 6, 2, 97-113 Google Scholar
  • 42. Smith, N.R. (1967). The Entrepreneur and his Firm: The Relationship between Type of Man and Type of Company. East Lansing:Michigan State University Press Google Scholar
  • 43. Stanworth, M.J.K. , Curran, J. (1976). ‘Growth and the small firm – an alternative view’. Journal of Management Studies. 13, 2, 95-110 Google Scholar
  • 44. Stinchcombe, A.L. , March, J.G. (1965). ‘Social structure and organizations’. Handbook of Organizations. Chicago:Rand McNally Google Scholar
  • 45. Titman, S. , Wessels, R. (1988). ‘The determinants of capital structure choice’. Journal of Finance. 43, 1, 1-19 Google Scholar
  • 46. Torii, A. , Caves, R.E. (1992). ‘Dual structure and differences of efficiency between Japanese large and small enterprises’. Industrial Efficiency in Six Nations. Cambridge Mass:MIT Press , 385-424 Google Scholar
  • 47. Van der Wijst, D. , Thurik, A.R. (1993). ‘Determinants of small firm debt ratios: an analysis of retail panel data’. Small Business Economics. 5, 1, 55-65 Google Scholar