Abstract
Critical infrastructure resilience has become a national priority for the US Department of Homeland Security. Rapid and efficient restoration of service in damaged transportation networks is a key area of focus. The intent of this paper is to formulate a bi-level optimisation model for network recovery and to demonstrate a solution approach for that optimisation model. The lower-level problem involves solving for network flows, while the upper-level problem identifies the optimal recovery modes and sequences, using tools from the literature on multi-mode project scheduling problems. Application and advantages of this method are demonstrated through two examples.
Keywords
References
- 1. (2003). ‘Solving the multimode resource-constrained project scheduling problem with genetic algorithms’. Journal of Operational Research Society. 54, 6, 614-626 Google Scholar
- 2. (1984). ‘Optimality conditions for the bilevel programming problem’. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly. 31, 1, 13-26 Google Scholar
- 3. (1984). ‘Two-level linear programming’. Management Science. 30, 8, 1004-1020 Google Scholar
- 4. (2012). ‘Restoration of bridge networks after an earthquake: multicriteria intervention optimization’. Earthquake Spectra. 28, 2, 427-455 Google Scholar
- 5. (1996). ‘Resource-constrained project scheduling by simulated annealing’. International Journal of Production Research. 34, 8, 2335-2351 Google Scholar
- 6. (2003). ‘A new efficient simulated annealing algorithm for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem and its multiple mode version’. European Journal of Operational Research. 149, 2, 268-281 Google Scholar
- 7. (2003). ‘A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities’. Earthquake Spectra. 19, 4, 733-752 Google Scholar
- 8. (2002). ‘Homeland Security Presidential Directive-3 (HSPD-3)’. Washington, DC Google Scholar
- 9. (2003). ‘Homeland Security Presidential Directive-7 (HSPD-7)’. Washington, DC Google Scholar
- 10. (2004). ‘Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities’. Earthquake Spectra. 20, 3, 739-755 Google Scholar
- 11. (2012). ‘Resilience: an indicator of recovery capability in intermodal freight transport’. Transportation Science. 46, 1, 109-123 Google Scholar
- 12. (2010). ‘Optimizing discounted cash flows in project scheduling – an ant colony optimization approach’. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C. 40, 1, 64-77 Google Scholar
- 13. (2010). ‘Disruption management in the airline industry – concepts, models and methods’. Computers and Operations Research. 37, 5, 809-821 Google Scholar
- 14. (1998). ‘Presidential Decision Directive PDD-63, Protecting America’s Critical Infrastructures’. Washington, DC Google Scholar
- 15. (2010). ‘Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions’. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. 7, 1, Article 51, 10.2202/1547-7355.1732 Google Scholar
- 16. (2009). ‘Differential evolution for solving, multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problems’. Computers & Operations Research. 36, 9, 2653-2659 Google Scholar
- 17. (2003). ‘Designing resilient, sustainable systems’. Environmental Science and Technology. 37, 23, 5330-5339 Google Scholar
- 18. (2010). ‘Developing measurement indices to enhance protection and resilience of critical infrastructures and key resources’. Journal of Business Continuity and Emergency Planning. 4, 3, 191-206 Google Scholar
- 19. (2001). ‘Project scheduling with multiple modes: a genetic algorithm’. Annals of Operations Research. 102, 1–4, 111-135 Google Scholar
- 20. (2012). ‘Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time’. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 99, 114-122 Google Scholar
- 21. (1973). ‘Resilience and stability of ecological systems’. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 4, 1-23 Google Scholar
- 22. (2008). ‘A combinatorial particle swarm optimization for solving multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problems’. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 195, 1, 299-308 Google Scholar
- 23. (2001). ‘Simulated annealing for multimode resource-constrained project scheduling’. Annals of Operations Research. 102, 1–4, 137-155 Google Scholar
- 24. (2013). ‘Systemic determination of infrastructure criticality’. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures. 9, 3, 211-225 Abstract, Google Scholar
- 25. (1997). ‘Local search for nonpreemptive multimode resource-constrained project scheduling’. IIE Transactions. 29, 11, 987-999 Google Scholar
- 26. (2011). ‘Postearthquake recovery of a water distribution system: discrete event simulation using colored Petri nets’. J. Infrastruct. Syst.. 17, 1, 25-34 Google Scholar
- 27. (2009). ‘Towards a conceptual framework for resilience engineering’. IEEE Systems Journal. 3, 2, 181-191 Google Scholar
- 28. (1997). ‘A genetic algorithm for multimode resource-constrained project scheduling’. European Journal of Operational Research. 100, 1, 134-141 Google Scholar
- 29. (2013). ‘Presidential Policy Directive 21: Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience’. Washington, DC Google Scholar
- 30. (1999). ‘A genetic algorithm approach to a general category project scheduling problem’. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C. 29, 1, 44-59 Google Scholar
- 31. (2013). ‘Integrating risk and resilience approaches to catastrophe management in engineering systems’. Risk Analysis. 33, 3, 356-366 Google Scholar
- 32. (1982). ‘Executive Order 13282, National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee’. Washington, DC Google Scholar
- 33. (2007). ‘Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters; multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions’. Environmental Hazards. 7, 4, 383-398 Google Scholar
- 34. (2005). ‘Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters: a computable general equilibrium analysis of water service disruptions’. Journal of Regional Science. 45, 1, 75-112 Google Scholar
- 35. (2010).
‘Coastal community resilience index: a community self-assessment’.
(accessed 17 June 2013) , [online] http://www.masgc.org/pdf/masgp/08-014.pdf Google Scholar - 36. ‘Conceptualizing and measuring resilience: a key to disaster loss reduction’. TR News. 2007, 05, 14-17 Google Scholar
- 37. (2007). Transportation Systems Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources Sector-Specific Plan as Input to the National Infrastructure Protection Plan. Washington, DC Google Scholar
- 38. (2009). ‘Two-phase genetic local search algorithm for the multimode resource-constrained project scheduling problem’. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. 3, 4, 848-857 Google Scholar
- 39. ‘Infrastructure resilience assessment through control design’. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures. 2011, 10, 7, 3, 243-260 Abstract, Google Scholar
- 40. , Gopalakrishnan, K. Peeta, S. (2010). ‘A framework for assessing the resilience of infrastructure and economic systems’. Sustainable and Resilient Critical Infrastructure Systems: Simulation, Modeling and Intelligent Engineering. New York:Springer-Verlag, Inc. Google Scholar
- 41. (2011).
‘On progressive network recovery after a major disruption’.
Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2011.
10–15 April ,Shanghai Google Scholar - 42. (2007). ‘Optimizing scheduling of post-earthquake electric power restoration tasks’. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 36, 2, 265-284 Google Scholar