Skip to main content
Search
Search
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Skip main navigation
No Access

A framework for the integration and coordination of the construction supply chain

Published Online:April 29, 2013pp 115-130https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPSCM.2013.053489

Abstract

The current construction supply chain is characterised by multiple subcontractors who perform most work on a construction project; provide their own resources, and coordinate between themselves under the general guidance of a main contractor. In fact, subcontractors’ schedules are integrated only at master level within the general contractor’s schedule and can be considered as distributed and heterogeneous. As a result, their coordination and integration can be a very challenging task. Although schedule coordination and integration could provide important benefits to the time and cost of construction projects, it has not attracted much attention from researchers and commercial software providers. This paper outlines the development of a solution for the coordination of schedules in the construction supply chain. While enabling coordination, the solution aims to put minimum constraints on planners; to accommodate planning information coming from different commercial planning tools, and to provide decision making capabilities. In addition, the solution is integrated within a 5D planning environment where the integrated schedules can be visualised and rehearsed.

Keywords

construction supply chain, schedules coordination, 4D/5D planning

References

  • 1. Amor, R. , Faraj, I. (2001). ‘Misconceptions about integrated project databases’. Journal of Information Technology in Construction. 6, 57-66 Google Scholar
  • 2. Arbulu, R.J. , Tommelein, I.D. , Walsh, K.D. , Hershauer, J.C. (2003). ‘Value stream analysis of a re-engineered construction supply chain’. Journal of Building Research and Information. 31, 2, 161-171 Google Scholar
  • 3. Autodesk Navisworks (2010). (accessed 10 May), [online] http://www.synchroltd.com/shop/synchro-professional_synchropro.htm Google Scholar
  • 4. Blismas, N. , Pasquire, C. , Gibb, A. (2006). ‘Benefits evaluation for off-site production in construction’. Construction Management and Economics. 24, 2, 121-130 Google Scholar
  • 5. Bottani, E. , Montanari, R. (2011). ‘Design and performance evaluation of supply networks: a simulation study’. Int. J. of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling. 3, 3, 226-269 Abstract, Google Scholar
  • 6. Choo, H.J. (2003). Distributed Planning and Coordination to Support Lean Construction. Berkeley:University of California , PhD dissertation Google Scholar
  • 7. Kim, K. , et al. (2003). ‘Distributed coordination of project schedule changes using agent-based compensatory negotiation methodology’. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing. 17, 2, Cambridge University Press, 115-131 Google Scholar
  • 8. Lambert, D. , Stock, J. , Ellram, L. (2008). Fundamental of Logistic Management. Boston, MA:Irwin McGraw-Hill Google Scholar
  • 9. O’Brien, W.J. , Issa, R.R. , Hammer, J. , Schmalz, M. , Geunes, J. , Bai, J. (2002). ‘SEEK: accomplishing enterprise information integration across heterogeneous sources’. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, Special Edition on Knowledge Management. 7, 101-124 Google Scholar
  • 10. Prasad, Ch.V.V.S.N.V. , Govindan, K. , Kulkarni, D.M. (2010). ‘Role of IT in SCM environment’. Int. J. of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling. 2, 1, 81-94 Abstract, Google Scholar
  • 11. Shaw, D.K. , Khan, D.A. (2012). ‘Optimal inventory policies of facilities in a supply chain system under fuzzy stochastic environment’. Int. J. of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling. 4, 2, 111-125 Abstract, Google Scholar
  • 12. Siddiqui, M. (2008). Coordination of Distributed Schedules in a Heterogeneous Environment: Identification of Conflicts Using Schedule Mappings. The University of Texas at Austin, PhD dissertation Google Scholar
  • 13. South East Centre for the Built Environment (2006). A Guide to Best Practice in Construction. (accessed on May 22), [online] http://www.secbe.org.uk/documents/introductory_best_practice_guide.pdf Google Scholar
  • 14. Sriprasert, E. , Dawood, N. (2003). ‘Multi-constraint information management and visualisation for collaborative planning and control in construction’. Journal of Information Technology in Construction. 8, 341-366 Google Scholar
  • 15. Synchro Ltd. (2010). Synchro Professional. (accessed on 10 May), [online] http://www.synchroltd.com/shop/synchro-professional_synchropro.htm Google Scholar
  • 16. Tommelein, I.D. , Walsh, K.D. , Hershauer, J.C. Improving Capital Projects Supply Chain Performance. 2003, 05, 241, A research Report to the Construction Industry Institute Google Scholar
  • 17. Turk, Z. (2001). ‘Phenomenological foundations of conceptual product modeling in architecture, engineering, and construction’. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering. 15, 2, 83-92 Google Scholar
  • 18. Zamanian, M.K. , Pittman, J.H. (1999). ‘A software industry perspective on AEC information models for distributed collaboration’. Automation in Construction. 8, 3, 237-248 Google Scholar
Next article