Skip to main content
Skip main navigation
No Access

Open innovation and collaboration in the financial services sector: exploring the role of trust

Published Online:pp 466-484https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2014.064609

This paper aims at exploring the role of trust within the financial services sector in relation to open and collaborative financial innovation. Financial services nowadays represent considerable share of the global economy. In the European Union (EU-27), financial services accounted for 5.9% of the gross value added in 2010 (Eurostat, 2011). There is a vast discussion about open innovation and the need for collaboration and knowledge sharing; however, in the process of building up this open and collaborative framework, trust does not yet seem to have a place in the academic debate. Relying on a review covering multiple literature streams and primary data collected from interviews, the relevant antecedents of trust in the financial services sector under this open and collaborative perspective, ex-post financial crisis are identified.

Keywords

financial services sector, open innovation, collaboration, trust

References

  • 1. Avlonitis, G.J. , Papastathopoulou, P.G. , Gounaris, S.P. (2001). ‘An empirically-based typology of product innovativeness for new financial services: Success and failure scenarios’. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 18, 5, Blackwell Publishing, 324-342 Google Scholar
  • 2. Baldwin, C.Y. , von Hippel, E.A. (2011). ‘Modelling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation’. Organization Science. 22, 6, 1399-1417 Google Scholar
  • 3. Brattström, A. , Löfsten, H. , Richtnér, A. (2012). ‘Creativity, trust and systematic processes in product development’. Research Policy. 41, 4, 743-755 Google Scholar
  • 4. Cassell, C. , Buehring, A. , Symon, G. , Johnson, P. (2006). ‘Qualitative methods in management research: an introduction to the themed issue’. Management Decision. 44, 2, 161-166 Google Scholar
  • 5. Chan, W.T. , Fengwei, Y. (2010). ‘A relationship between the quality attributes and the trust in financial services information systems’. TENCON 2010 – 2010 IEEE Region 10 Conference, 1077-1081 Google Scholar
  • 6. Chesbrough, H. , Crowther, A.K. (2006). ‘Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries’. R&D Management. 36, 3, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 229-236 Google Scholar
  • 7. Cosgrove-Sacks, C. , Dembinski, P.H. , Stückelberger, C. (2012). Trust and Ethics in Finance Innovative ideas from the Robin Cosgrove Prize. Geneva:Globethics.net Head Office Google Scholar
  • 8. Costanzo, L.A. , Keasey, K. , Short, H. (2003). ‘A strategic approach to the study of innovation in the financial services industry: the case of telephone banking’. Journal of Marketing Management. 19, 3/4, Routledge, 259-281 Google Scholar
  • 9. Council, E. , P.I.D. of the G.S. of the Council (2012). ‘Financial crisis: key terms in 23 languages’. General Secretariat of the Council Directorate-General A – Personnel and Administration Directorate 3 – Translation and Document Production. Belgium Google Scholar
  • 10. Dahlander, L. , Gann, D.M. (2010). ‘How open is innovation?’. Research Policy. 39, 6, 699-709 Google Scholar
  • 11. Davis, J.H. , Lee, M. , Ruhe, J. (2008). ‘Trust: an intercultural comparison of consumer perceptions’. International Journal of Commerce and Management. 18, 2, 150-165 Google Scholar
  • 12. De Bono, E. (2010). Simplicity. Toronto:Penguin Group (Canada) Google Scholar
  • 13. Dyer, J.H. , Singh, H. (1998). ‘The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage’. Academy of Management Review. 23, 4, Academy of Management, 660-679 Google Scholar
  • 14. Eurostat (2011). Statistics Eurostat website. (accessed November 2012), [online] http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search database Google Scholar
  • 15. Fasnacht, D. (2009). Open Innovation in the Financial Services: Growing through Openness, Flexibility and Customer Integration. Heidelberg:Verlag, Springer , 209 Google Scholar
  • 16. Fawcett, S.E. , Jones, S.L. , Fawcett, A.M. (2012). ‘Supply chain trust: the catalyst for collaborative innovation’. Business Horizons. 55, 2, 163-178 Google Scholar
  • 17. Frame, W.S. , White, L.J. (2004). ‘Empirical studies of financial innovation: lots of talk, little action?’. Journal of Economic Literature. 42, 1, American Economic Association, 116-144 Google Scholar
  • 18. Gadrey, J. , Gallouj, F. , Weinstein, O. (1995). ‘New modes of innovation: how services benefit industry’. International Journal of Service Industry Management. 6, 3, 4-16 Google Scholar
  • 19. Gulati, R. , Sytch, M. (2008). ‘Does familiarity breed trust? Revisiting the antecedents of trust’. Managerial and Decision Economics. 29, 2–3, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 165-190 Google Scholar
  • 20. Gummesson, E. (2006). ‘Qualitative research in management: addressing complexity, context and persona’. Management Decision. 44, 2, 167-179 Google Scholar
  • 21. Gurtman, M.B. (1992). ‘Trust, distrust, and interpersonal problems: a circumplex analysis’. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 62, 6, 989-1002 Google Scholar
  • 22. Haldane, A.G. , Madouros, V. What is the Contribution of the Financial Sector? VOX Research-Based Policy Analysis and Commentary from Leading Economists. 2011, 11, 22, (accessed November 2012), [online] http://www.voxeu.org/article/what-contribution-financial-sector Google Scholar
  • 23. Heffernan, T. (2004). ‘Trust formation in cross-cultural business-to-business relationships’. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal. 7, 2, 114-125 Google Scholar
  • 24. Kanter, R.M. (2011). ‘How great companies think differently’. Harvard Business Review. 89, 11, Harvard Business School Publication Corp, 66-78 Google Scholar
  • 25. Knafl, K.A. , Howard, M.J. (1984). ‘Interpreting and reporting qualitative research’. Research in Nursing and Health. 7, 1, 17-24 Google Scholar
  • 26. Krugman, P. Money for Nothing. 2009, 04, 27, New York, NY, USA:The New York Times Google Scholar
  • 27. Lerner, J. , Tufano, P. (2011). ‘The consequences of financial innovation: a counterfactual research agenda’. Annual Review of Financial Economics. 3, 1, 41-85 Google Scholar
  • 28. Lösch, A. (2006). ‘Combining quantitative methods and grounded theory for researching e-reverse auctions’. International Journal of Libraries and Information Services. 56, 3, 133-144 Google Scholar
  • 29. Manceau, D. , Moatti, V. , Fabbri, J. , Kaltenbach, P-F. , Bagger-Hansen, L. (2011). Open Innovation: What’s Behind the Buzzword?. (accessed September 2012), ESCP Europe & Accenture, [online] http://www.accenture.com/us-en/Pages/insight-open-innovation.aspx Google Scholar
  • 30. McAllister, D.J. (1995). ‘Affect and cognition-based trust as foundations of interpersonal cooperation in organizations’. Academy of Management Journal. 38, 1, Academy of Management, 24-59 Google Scholar
  • 31. (2007). Innovation in Financial Services. (accessed October 2012), 1-8, McKinsey Survey, [online] http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Innovation_in_financial_services_A_McKinsey_Global_Survey_1900 Google Scholar
  • 32. Mention, A-L. (2011a). ‘Intellectual capital reporting: an exploratory study on the practices in the banking industry’. Journal of Management Control. 22, 3, 279-309 Google Scholar
  • 33. Mention, A-L. Innovation for Financial Services. 2011b, 09, (accessed 10 June 2012), Innovation Management, [online] http://www.innovationmanagement.se/2011/09/13/innovation-for-financial-services Google Scholar
  • 34. Mention, A-L. , Torkkeli, M. (2012). ‘Drivers, processes and consequences of financial innovation: a research agenda’. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management. 16, 1/2, 5-29 AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • 35. Micuda, I. (2011). ‘Typologies of innovation in the financial services sector: limits and implications’. Recent Advances in Business Administration. (accessed June 2012), 27-31, [online] http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2011/Mexico/ICBA/ICBA-04.pdf Google Scholar
  • 36. OECD/INFE (2012). High-Level Principles on National Strategies for Financial Education. Paris:OECD Google Scholar
  • 37. Oliveira, P. , Von Hippel, E. (2011). ‘Users as service innovators: the case of banking services’. Research Policy. 40, 6, 806-818 Google Scholar
  • 38. Parkhe, A. (1998). ‘Understanding trust in international alliances’. Journal of World Business. 33, 3, 219-240 Google Scholar
  • 39. Schoorman, F.D. , Mayer, R.C. , Davis, J.H. (2007). ‘An integrative model of organizational trust: past, present and future’. Academy of Management Review. 32, 2, Academy of Management, 344-354 Google Scholar
  • 40. Seidel, J.V. (1998). Qualitative Data Analysis. (accessed May 2012), (Originally published as Qualitative Data Analysis in The Ethnograph v5.0: A Users Guide, Appendix E 1998, Qualis Research, Colorado Springs, CO.) [online] http://www.qualisresearch.com/qda_paper.htm Google Scholar
  • 41. SIFMA (2010). U.S. Financial Services Industry-Contributing to a More Competitive US Economy. New York Google Scholar
  • 42. Skardon, J. (2011). ‘The role of trust in innovation networks’. Social and Behavioral Sciences, Procedia. 26, 85-93 Google Scholar
  • 43. Springford, J. (2011). A Confidence Crisis? Restoring Trust in Financial Services. London:Social Market Foundation Google Scholar
  • 44. Tyler, K. , Stanley, E. (2007). ‘The role of trust in financial services business relationships’. Journal of Services Marketing. 21, 5, 334-344 Google Scholar
  • 45. Van Breda, A.D. (2001). Resilience Theory: A Literature Review. Pretoria, South Africa, 54 Google Scholar
  • 46. Van Horne, J.C. (1985). ‘Of financial innovations and excesses’. Journal of Finance. 40, 3, 621-631 Google Scholar
  • 47. Vanston, N. (2012). Trust and Reputation in Financial Services. London:Government Office for Science , Driver Review DR30, Foresight Google Scholar
  • 48. Vinten, G. (1995). ‘Open versus closed questions- an open issue’. Management Decision. 33, 4, 27-31 Google Scholar
  • 49. World Economic Forum, Wyman, O. (2012). Rethinking Financial Innovation Reducing Negative Outcomes While Retaining the Benefits. Geneva Google Scholar