Abstract
As global competition intensifies, transnational corporations are internationalising even the most knowledge-intensive corporate functions, such as research and development (R&D). Today, corporations in industries such as automobiles are establishing R&D facilities in selected developing countries. They do this to enhance their efficiency, to access expanding pools of scientists and engineers, and to meet the demands in these countries. These recent trends have important implications for the international division of labour and stress the need for coherent national policies to ensure benefits from this evolution. This study aims to identify the localisation of product development activities based on Porter’s (1998) diamond model for competitive advantage of location, and Kuchiki’s (2005) flowchart approach for government policies. The analysis is based on case studies of automobile assemblers that have headquarters in Triad markets and facilities in Brazil. Brazilian competitive advantages of location are investigated, and implications for host government policies proposed, from the viewpoint of leveraging location specific advantages for R&D localisation.
Keywords
References
- 1. (2002). Annual Report of the Brazilian Automobile Industry. Sao Paulo Google Scholar
- 2. (2010). Annual Report of the Brazilian Automobile Industry. Sao Paulo Google Scholar
- 3. (2003).
‘International division of labour in product development activities: towards a selective decentralization’.
Eleventh GERPISA International Colloquium ,June ,Paris Google Scholar - 4. (2006). ‘From adaptation to complete vehicle design, a case study of product development capabilities in a carmaker in Brazil’. International Journal of Technological Management. 36, 1–3, 91-107 Abstract, Google Scholar
- 5. ‘The integration of emerging market subsidiaries in the global product development: a case study of car makers in Brazil’. Journal of the Graduate School of Asia-Pacific Studies. 2009, 11, 18, 163-186 Google Scholar
- 6. ‘Product development process with focus on value engineering and target-costing: a case-study in an automotive company’. International Journal of Production Economics. 2007, 02, 105, 2, 459-474 Google Scholar
- 7. (2007). ‘The Toyota way of global knowledge creation: the ‘learn local, act global’ strategy’. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management. 7, 2/3, 116-134 Abstract, Google Scholar
- 8. (2005). A Flowchart Approach, in Kuchiki A., Tsuji M., Industrial Clusters in Asia. London:Palgrave Macmillan Google Scholar
- 9. (2008). The Flowchart Approach to Industrial Cluster Policy. London:Palgrave Macmillan Google Scholar
- 10. (2004).
‘The Brazilian car industry in transition: convergence and differentiation with regard to other productive models’.
Twelfth GERPISA International Colloquium ,Paris Google Scholar - 11. ‘The globalization of markets’. Harvard Business Review. 1983, 05–06, 61, 3, 92-102 Google Scholar
- 12. (1999). ‘Platform strategies in international new product development’. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 19, 5/6, 449-459 Google Scholar
- 13. (1998). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York:Free Press Google Scholar
- 14. (2000).
‘The implications of globalisation for the distribution of design competencies in the auto industry in Mercosur’.
Eighth GERPISA International Colloquium ,Paris Google Scholar - 15. (2009). ‘The importance of locally commanded design for the consolidation of local supply chain: the concept of design headquarters’. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management. 16, 4, 361-376 Abstract, Google Scholar
- 16. (1994). Engines of Growth: The State and Transnational Auto Companies in Brazil. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
- 17. (2010). Brazilian Autoparts Industry Performance. Sao Paulo:Sindipeca Google Scholar