Abstract
The primary aim of this study is to explore the strategy-export performance link by adapting Porter’s (1980) classification scheme to an export context. Using a sample of 79 exporting firms established in Greece, this study employs a multiple linear regression model to examine the direct effect of generic business strategies on export sales intensity. The findings reveal that a differentiation strategy is an important contributor to export sales intensity for Greek manufacturing firms competing in the international arena. Given the negative effect of this strategic choice, recommendations for adapting the characteristics of differentiation have to be qualified. Obviously, when competing abroad, such an adaptation may require a thorough and systematic examination of the products or related services that are perceived to be sufficiently unique or valuable for customers to justify paying premium prices.
Keywords
References
- 1. (1989). ‘Management influences on export performance: a review of the empirical literature 1978–88’. International Marketing Review. 6, 4, 53-68 Google Scholar
- 2. (2000). ‘Export strategies and performance of firms from emerging economies: evidence from Brazil, Chile and Mexico’. Academy of Management Journal. 43, 3, 342-361 Google Scholar
- 3. (1995). EQS for Windows User’s Guide. Encino, USA:Multivariate Software, Inc. Google Scholar
- 4. (1984). ‘Organizational characteristics associated with export activity’. Journal of Management Studies. 21, 1, 3-22 Google Scholar
- 5. (1987). ‘Firm and management characteristics as discriminators of export marketing activity’. Journal of Business Research. 15, 221-235 Google Scholar
- 6. (1985). ‘The impact of export strategy on export sales performance’. Journal of International Business Studies. 16, 1, 37-54 Google Scholar
- 7. (1984). ‘Porter’s (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance’. Academy of Management Journal. 27, 3, 467-488 Google Scholar
- 8. , McDonald, F. Mayer, M. Buck, T. (2004). ‘Typology of international business strategies’. The Process of Internationalisation: Strategic, Cultural and Policy Perspectives. Houndmills, UK:Palgrave Google Scholar
- 9. (1998). ‘An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment’. Journal of Marketing Research. XXV, 186-192 Google Scholar
- 10. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed., USA:Pearson Prentice Hall Google Scholar
- 11. (2007). International Business–Competing in the Global Marketplace. 6th ed., USA:McGraw-Hill Irwin Google Scholar
- 12. (1984). ‘Generic competitive strategies–an analytical approach’. Strategic Management Journal. 5, 367-380 Google Scholar
- 13. (2000). ‘Firm-level export performance assessment: review, evaluation and development’. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 28, 4, 493-511 Google Scholar
- 14. (1995). ‘Managerial perceptions of the adequacy of export incentives programmes: implications for export-led economic development policy’. Journal of Business Research. 32, 2, 163-174 Google Scholar
- 15. (2002). ‘Marketing strategy determinants of export performance: a meta-analysis’. Journal of Business Research. 55, 51-67 Google Scholar
- 16. (2005). ‘Firm size, business experience and export intensity in SMEs: a longitudinal approach to complex relationships’. International Business Review. 14, 719-738 Google Scholar
- 17. (1986). ‘Porter’s (1980) generic strategies and performance: an empirical examination with American data’. Organization Studies. 7, 1, 37-55 Google Scholar
- 18. ‘Export strategy for small business’. Journal of Small Business Management. 1988, 04, 32-37 Google Scholar
- 19. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York:Free Press Google Scholar
- 20. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York:Free Press Google Scholar
- 21. (1986). Competition in Global Industries. Boston:Harvard Business School Press Google Scholar
- 22. (2010). ‘Strategy types of service firms: evidence from Greece’. Management Decision. 48, 7, 1033-1047 Google Scholar
- 23. (2009). ‘Strategy types of exporting firms: a view on the basis of competitive advantage’. European Business Review. 21, 2, 144-158 Google Scholar
- 24. (1990). ‘Influence of firm size on export planning and performance’. Journal of Business Research. 20, 3, 235-248 Google Scholar
- 25. (2004). ‘Strategy and industry effects on profitability: evidence from Greece’. Strategic Management Journal. 25, 139-165 Google Scholar
- 26. (2011). ‘Export performance under the microscope: a glance through Spanish lenses’. International Business Review. 20, 117-135 Google Scholar
- 27. (2007). ‘Strategic purity: a multi-industry evaluation of pure vs. hybrid business strategies’. Strategic Management Journal. 28, 553-561 Google Scholar
- 28. (1980). Measuring and Assessing Organizations. New York:Wiley Google Scholar
- 29. (1989). ‘Strategic orientation of business enterprises: the construct, dimensionality and measurement’. Management Science. 35, 8, 942-962 Google Scholar
- 30. (2008). ‘UK export performance research’. International Small Business Journal. 26, 2, 207-239 Google Scholar
- 31. (1986). ‘Generic business strategies, organizational context and performance: an empirical investigation’. Strategic Management Journal. 7, 3, 217-231 Google Scholar
- 32. , Dean, B. Cassidy, J. (1990). ‘Rivalry among firms: evidence from the apparel industry’. Strategic Management: Methods and Studies. New York:Elsevier , 93-110 Google Scholar
- 33. (1991). ‘Generic strategies and business performance: an empirical study of the screw machine products industry’. British Journal of Management. 2, 1-9 Google Scholar
- 34. (1998). ‘The EXPERF scale: a cross-national generalized export performance measure’. Journal of International Marketing. 6, 3, 37-58 Google Scholar